Meta tags:
Headings (most frequently used words):
of, for, nomination, deletion, talk, in, human, discussion, template, up, you, the, at, merging, rights, banner, to, fyi, thanks, and, lonelypages, see, reproductive, birth, control, proposed, life, oral, united, states, please, if, on, opinion, wikipedia, now, listed, redirects, international, user, zodon, contents, welcome, conflict, interest, follow, drsavard, coi, was, right, gender, super, as, requested, simplified, version, kill, watt, claim, about, reading, errors, redlinks, also, section, equivalent, drug, categorization, consensus, sought, health, can, afd, comparison, methods, womb, veil, plan, opower, entry, hohm, combined, contraceptive, pill, adolescent, sexuality, add, environmental, management, planetary, boundaries, its, needed, weigh, public, climate, change, regarding, adding, global, warming, conspiracy, theory, there, merge, access, time, revision, history, chopped, help, would, be, appreciated, possible, your, is, wanted, thank, fa, guidance, great, edits, barnstar, prenatal, care, categories_for_discussion, log, 2012_april_11, category, medical_software, re, new, estrogenics, etc, templates, contragestion, wiki, med, library, offering, accounts, from, cochrane, collaboration, sign, road, cancer, prevention, kids, list, single, board, computers, arbcom, elections, are, open, methamphetamine_and_sex, substantive, organizations, instruments, spin, anal, sex,
Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (352), you (119), talk (118), for (117), and (115), comment (110), #discussion (99), utc (88), reply (86), article (81), that (80), wikipedia (65), edit (64), comments (55), latest (51), ago (51), years (50), not (47), deletion (45), page (43), your (41), this (40), are (40), with (38), have (38), about (34), person (31), but (31), template (31), zodon (30), articles (30), may (29), would (29), please (28), there (28), people (28), was (26), more (26), can (25), see (24), thanks (22), will (22), has (21), been (20), which (20), help (20), september (20), like (19), 2011 (19), importance (19), nomination (18), some (18), top (18), also (18), 2009 (18), thank (17), templates (17), should (17), 2012 (17), what (17), march (16), all (16), birth (16), control (16), proposed (15), human (15), new (15), user (14), from (14), other (14), list (14), one (14), time (14), any (13), medical (13), find (13), information (13), just (13), don (13), 2010 (13), high (12), add (11), consensus (11), history (11), sources (11), rights (11), want (11), july (11), how (11), think (11), here (11), material (11), well (11), 2008 (11), welcome (10), february (10), why (10), merging (10), since (10), access (10), free (10), then (10), interest (10), than (10), make (10), edits (10), topic (9), because (9), editors (9), our (9), wish (9), cancer (9), get (9), april (9), them (9), much (9), version (9), address (8), until (8), sex (8), pages (8), entry (8), international (8), guidelines (8), life (8), library (8), know (8), most (8), read (8), even (8), good (8), take (8), reproductive (8), being (8), adding (8), could (8), they (8), were (8), october (8), section (8), text (7), redirect (7), listed (7), oral (7), removing (7), explain (7), several (7), concern (7), nominated (7), might (7), editing (7), needed (7), remove (7), still (7), health (7), contragestion (7), way (7), back (7), united (7), states (7), when (7), fyi (7), main (7), first (7), references (7), its (7), opinion (7), understand (7), 181 (7), http (7), contraception (7), very (7), condom (7), contents (6), policy (6), org (6), redirects (6), log (6), contributions (6), issues (6), reach (6), while (6), appreciated (6), already (6), done (6), lonelypages (6), related (6), now (6), policies (6), quality (6), whether (6), cochrane (6), tools (6), reference (6), interested (6), long (6), who (6), better (6), links (6), category (6), enough (6), keep (6), another (6), barnstar (6), having (6), few (6), hide (6), womb (6), veil (6), comparison (6), conflict (6), non (5), index (5), php (5), title (5), oldid (5), including (5), participate (5), anal (5), process (5), without (5), deleted (5), invited (5), editor (5), improve (5), however (5), contribute (5), single (5), sign (5), give (5), content (5), such (5), medicine (5), general (5), too (5), etc (5), respond (5), appreciate (5), great (5), less (5), possible (5), project (5), around (5), work (5), 146 (5), public (5), change (5), note (5), subject (5), point (5), look (5), barrier (5), views (5), methods (5), link (5), simplified (5), below (5), rankings (5), move (5), drsavard (5), banner (5), search (4), view (4), organization (4), use (4), user_talk (4), taking (4), name (4), raised (4), exist (4), dated (4), notice (4), summary (4), organizations (4), appear (4), community (4), committee (4), arbitration (4), open (4), concerns (4), discussed (4), evidence (4), board (4), computers (4), inclusion (4), road (4), prevention (4), kids (4), june (4), per (4), account (4), full (4), care (4), collaboration (4), reliable (4), source (4), citation (4), resource (4), research (4), wiki (4), fact (4), readers (4), probably (4), contraceptive (4), those (4), moved (4), added (4), made (4), sorry (4), question (4), date (4), feel (4), doing (4), sure (4), leave (4), important (4), thinking (4), really (4), afd (4), sense (4), items (4), arthur (4), rubin (4), only (4), merge (4), diff (4), sexuality (4), encyclopedia (4), rules (4), reason (4), kindly (4), further (4), neutral (4), american (4), criticism (4), citations (4), nothing (4), something (4), ask (4), after (4), female (4), orphans (4), force (4), gender (4), mid (4), ranking (4), cervical (4), considered (4), col (4), begin (4), sidebar (4), table (3), statement (3), available (3), agree (3), edited (3), 2023 (3), place (3), potential (3), problem (3), anyone (3), reached (3), username (3), did (3), individual (3), consider (3), stop (3), result (3), spin (3), ppemes (3), instruments (3), substantive (3), had (3), methamphetamine_and_sex (3), current (3), message (3), users (3), during (3), according (3), cheers (3), otherwise (3), accounts (3), gets (3), thought (3), recent (3), learn (3), involved (3), guide (3), tips (3), online (3), book (3), working (3), world (3), seems (3), pretty (3), same (3), noticed (3), needs (3), put (3), drug (3), class (3), instead (3), hormonal (3), drugs (3), isn (3), either (3), estrogenics (3), useful (3), combined (3), bit (3), yet (3), red (3), fixed (3), always (3), try (3), categories_for_discussion (3), 2012_april_11 (3), medical_software (3), lead (3), response (3), cut (3), among (3), month (3), especially (3), addition (3), aware (3), status (3), improvement (3), bold (3), 20th (3), pov (3), maybe (3), noleander (3), movement (3), women (3), large (3), worked (3), doesn (3), clear (3), many (3), wasn (3), revision (3), sustainability (3), weigh (3), regarding (3), global (3), warming (3), conspiracy (3), theory (3), climate (3), removed (3), later (3), planetary (3), boundaries (3), environmental (3), management (3), provided (3), again (3), adolescent (3), changes (3), referenced (3), need (3), original (3), removal (3), cite (3), stand (3), reviewed (3), seem (3), won (3), where (3), opower (3), written (3), feedback (3), plan (3), into (3), interesting (3), almost (3), clearly (3), century (3), term (3), english (3), right (3), out (3), error (3), times (3), equivalent (3), redlinks (3), dozen (3), least (3), different (3), looking (3), tagged (3), data (3), pdf (3), low (3), included (3), assessment (3), task (3), seemed (3), things (3), hpv (3), coi (3), presented (3), questions (3), toggle (2), contact (2), privacy (2), under (2), additional (2), terms (2), site (2), profit (2), anonymous (2), real (2), bot (2), each (2), improving (2), allows (2), speedy (2), processes (2), prevent (2), reasons (2), following (2), 2020 (2), criminal (2), law (2), asked (2), november (2), between (2), serious (2), election (2), statements (2), bans (2), arbcom (2), elections (2), focuses (2), suitable (2), 2013 (2), active (2), come (2), 100 (2), support (2), scholarly (2), libraries (2), archives (2), journal (2), offering (2), hope (2), purpose (2), wikiproject (2), med (2), changed (2), biased (2), violation (2), assuming (2), npov (2), lost (2), based (2), personal (2), judgment (2), bias (2), appears (2), itself (2), modified (2), imo (2), appropriate (2), anyway (2), pharmacology (2), easily (2), haven (2), these (2), navigation (2), include (2), created (2), bad (2), mentioned (2), length (2), suggest (2), prenatal (2), hard (2), everything (2), own (2), controversial (2), discuss (2), improvements (2), approach (2), best (2), alone (2), particularly (2), course (2), condition (2), guidance (2), learning (2), relevant (2), wanted (2), difficulty (2), okay (2), ipsign (2), cpu (2), power (2), dissipation (2), trying (2), takes (2), complete (2), though (2), myself (2), admin (2), paste (2), started (2), handle (2), mathematical (2), logic (2), topics (2), chopped (2), going (2), ohanaunited (2), granitethighs (2), 137 (2), once (2), often (2), amounts (2), finding (2), kleinbell (2), wrote (2), makes (2), does (2), peer (2), notability (2), pill (2), anything (2), leaving (2), sections (2), forum (2), wrong (2), cameron (2), scott (2), hohm (2), left (2), mark (2), specifically (2), responded (2), prod (2), write (2), contributing (2), broader (2), choice (2), others (2), ancient (2), 19th (2), both (2), specific (2), area (2), concerned (2), common (2), far (2), heads (2), opinions (2), criteria (2), four (2), tildes (2), found (2), safe (2), cat (2), exactly (2), system (2), categorization (2), sought (2), their (2), originated (2), matter (2), posting (2), test (2), half (2), kill (2), watt (2), claim (2), reading (2), errors (2), thoughts (2), show (2), hidden (2), suppress (2), orphan (2), explanation (2), extra (2), draft (2), luck (2), requested (2), database (2), 122 (2), ryoung (2), largest (2), super (2), differences (2), huge (2), choose (2), factual (2), simon (2), speed (2), figure (2), rating (2), whatamidoing (2), skipped (2), generally (2), random (2), example (2), stis (2), objections (2), correct (2), someplace (2), although (2), projects (2), lot (2), ill (2), count (2), suggested (2), step (2), follow (2), tries (2), roleplayer (2), portal (2), archive (2), appearance (2), upload (2), file (2), languages (2), create (2), donate (2), menu (2), mobile, cookie, statistics, developers, code, conduct, legal, safety, contacts, disclaimers, apply, using, registered, trademark, wikimedia, foundation, inc, creative, commons, attribution, sharealike, license, rendered, parsoid, last, retrieved, https, 1142669939, 2022, fastilybot, nominate, refer, details, particular, constructive, cited, fails, gng, 2019, involvement, 2017, klaun, methamphetamine, 2016, sdrewth, billinghurst, eligible, vote, panel, responsible, conducting, authority, enact, binding, solutions, disputes, primarily, behavioural, unable, resolve, includes, ability, impose, restrictions, measures, maintain, environment, describes, roles, responsibilities, greater, detail, submit, choices, 2015, mediawiki, delivery, voting, review, candidates, 2014, andy, dingley, edcolins, ocaasi, generously, agreed, cost, 300, 800, independent, nonprofit, conducts, systematic, reviews, randomized, controlled, trials, interventions, publishes, behind, paywalls, signed, donation, twl, become, coordinator, teach, interns, disambiguate, authors, papers, newsletter, books, bytes, wikidata, metadata, loves, publishers, archivists, universities, bookshelf, meta, outreach, local, newspaper, bibliographies, guides, discover, desk, exchange, services, december, anthonyhcole, contacting, participant, forming, range, minded, professional, societies, schools, governments, ngos, translators, borders, wikimed, august, raz, ock, contend, standing, demonstrated, disagree, invite, defend, loss, draw, attention, interim, word, longer, frankly, contention, mifepristone, fwiw, worse, restored, updated, attend, asap, contribs, el3ctr0nika, altogether, exclusively, action, agents, act, via, estrogen, progesterone, receptors, progestogenics, overwhelming, convenient, estrogens, progestogens, over, exception, mean, kinds, stub, gotten, kind, summaries, join, karlb, sermon, woman, skirt, short, arouse, cover, essentials, ronald, knox, allyssa, abacan, hello, told, twice, lengthened, wikipedians, 179, modest, guess, counts, virtual, decreţei, ciao, ongepotchket, typos, catch, hence, bringing, suggestions, polished, strive, solid, passes, managers, stable, continuing, brief, possibility, none, identified, refrain, event, happened, resume, discussing, figured, except, apropos, today, s_featured_article, requests, zondon, highest, prose, grammar, spelling, lose, plural, punctuation, nominating, sometime, next, stayed, notch, shape, iud, installed, headache, tomorrow, 32cllou, provide, input, legitimacy, desirability, accepting, external, freely, accessible, neurologic, disorders, presto54, medmerits, tables, pitch, realized, whole, idea, opened, letting, away, mhz, progress, days, line, proposals, let, able, yourself, big, deal, finish, syn, encountered, said, realize, moving, cleaning, cleanup, gamewizard71, favor, rename, accordance, accreditation, standards, fix, transhumanist, outline, music, sorter, 140, large_cities_climate_leadership_group, 432283159, 432278426, 421531280, 421528249, prev, 421531277, 429845197, 429841834, whom, shouldn, anon, anons, previous, ones, zhe, canvass, offered, opportunity, regard, incredibly, obscene, lack, hopeful, return, january, meitar, build, enforce, ignore, cautious, major, preserve, summarizes, developed, lacks, indicating, conducive, flagging, referencing, allowing, honest, struggle, unreferenced, accurate, sasisasi, verifiability, merely, quoting, sensationalizing, synthesis, reverted, nice, reminded, lede, points, abortifacient, phrase, small, increase, cancers, basis, iarc, qualification, controversy, currently, unresolved, mere, chronology, informs, association, credibility, character, fair, definitely, dubious, booster, looked, didn, unlikely, criticisms, seed, gather, taken, deprecated, wouldn, actually, bothered, tech, revolve, five, yes, got, embrionic, indication, facilitate, deleting, folks, delete, misused, originally, leads, onus, justify, stick, stating, advertisement, dag, kdg, kudpung, basically, covered, family, planning, never, proportions, unbalanced, structure, mind, greco, roman, antiquity, cynwolfe, scope, dislike, dozens, precisely, defined, propose, suspect, introduce, egyptians, focused, early, worldwide, perspective, preposterous, insisting, quaker, marriage, egyptian, wedding, rites, conjunction, america, popular, visit, improved, experience, form, introduced, edward, bliss, foote, 1864, became, certain, forms, couple, decades, disappears, becomes, medicalized, determine, used, outside, distinctive, part, discourse, attitudes, toward, period, suggestion, easier, wondering, totally, noodles, addiction, automatic, notification, erwin85bot, end, debate, meets, nominator, believe, satisfies, explained, his, her, before, dug, causing, fill, tag, ref, vittinghoff, raise, alexd, reproductive_health, name_change_to_sexual_and_reproductive_health, thorough, description, issue, post, ἀνυπόδητος, pharm, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, levels, mirror, consolidated, anatomical, therapeutic, chemical, classification, target, organ, crossed, paths, gardens, reffing, multiple, iffy, skip, sievert, missed, says, tedder, mos, layout, undo, copied, observed, google, authoritative, actual, photograph, equipment, operation, reports, shows, faulty, unit, news, york, expectations, limited, 210, hiding, implemented, generate, wikilist, track, hasn, style, rather, defaulted, whatever, preferred, offer, option, parameter, regularly, heading, down, lines, rest, listing, opens, complex, interface, simpler, selections, click, powerful, language, hey, confusing, tags, off, argument, gives, applicable, request, entirety, sound, soon, sandahl, compare, idl, grg, assertion, ratio, strong, validated, repository, upenn, edu, dissertations, aai3109224, study, supercentenarians, greetings, goal, educate, humans, live, longevity, factor, females, expectancy, males, countries, tend, male, pakistan, mainly, due, underlying, biological, factors, men, ride, motorcycles, www, scielo, clin, v61n5, 31813, correcting, intentioned, dangerously, soap, water, worried, saw, knowledge, restrict, deliberate, vandalism, finally, quite, assess, hundreds, duty, approximate, associated, decide, thing, mistakes, unknown, importance_medicine_articles, given, match, through, lens, ratings, sentences, pathetic, unless, poor, average, schoolteacher, stack, cds, obvious, omission, teacher, bottom, selected, lined, hypothetical, reader, fall, disclosure, generic, boilerplate, replaced, call, cases, assessing, thousands, weeks, muddled, perfect, illustration, overload, thoughtful, candidate, matters, case, wack, ventured, priority, object, besides, scale, avoided, papillomavirus, everybody, documentation, potentially, importances, instance, ranked, receives, primary, preventing, significant, fraction, burden, declare, separate, estimate, scheme, hoping, making, violate, fellow, contributor, forward, past, vaccine, pap, dealing, devote, lately, trouble, resolving, dispute, disputed, informative, coin, consistently, favoring, product, company, consult, interpretations, representative, relating, screening, presentation, present, downsides, upsides, ballance, understood, tried, true, flagged, consulted, qiagen, role, unlike, highly, respected, experts, supports, presume, expert, assume, frequently, relied, reflect, accepted, fun, play, skills, sandbox, messages, automatically, insert, signature, stamp, button, tool, bar, above, window, hub, activity, ruleset, overview, foundations, pillars, quick, codes, cheatsheet, department, directory, resources, explore, happy, contributors, enjoy, introduction, stay, printable, download, print, export, switch, legacy, parser, shortened, url, permanent, groups, logs, actions, supported, special, events, jump,
Text of the page (random words):
es are the top 1 high importance articles are the top 10 low is the bottom half so if you selected 100 medicine related articles at random complete list available here and lined them up according to importance to the hypothetical general reader where would it fall if it s clearly first in the list then it s top if it s clearly in the top 10 then it s high another way of thinking about this is through the lens of wp 1 0 ratings top importance articles will always be included even if they re just a dozen sentences long and have one pathetic reference high importance articles will almost be included unless they re in poor condition mid importance articles are included if the individual article is any good but skipped if it is below average quality low importance articles are generally skipped so think about a schoolteacher with wikipedia on a stack of cds how obvious would the article s omission be to the teacher a common approach is to look at the other articles in the given importance category and see whether this article is a better match for this list or that list finally there s nothing quite like learning by doing for this if you d like to have a go at category unknown importance_medicine_articles and assess a few dozen or hundreds then i think you ll get a better handle on it if figure that our first duty is to get an approximate rating associated with each article if we later decide that this high is really mid or the other way around then that s not a bad thing we just don t want to make huge mistakes like rating something low when it should be high whatamidoing talk 18 48 26 july 2008 utc reply thanks edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 1 person in discussion the human sexuality barnstar thank you for your well referenced improvements to the safe sex article simon speed talk 22 22 13 october 2008 utc reply especially thanks for correcting a well intentioned but dangerously non factual addition about soap and water i worried about this when i saw it but like most editors don t have the medical knowledge and pretty much restrict myself to removing deliberate vandalism simon speed talk 22 22 13 october 2008 utc reply i was right edit latest comment 17 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion please read http www scielo br pdf clin v61n5 31813 pdf i don t do citations on wikipedia you can choose to do so if you wish my goal is to educate the public as to how long humans really live and to explain why there are differences in longevity gender is a huge factor with females having a better life expectancy than males in all but a few countries which tend to be very male biased such as pakistan the point here is to show that the gender differences are mainly due to underlying biological factors not just bias in research or men ride motorcycles ryoung 122 12 31 6 february 2009 utc reply gender and super c s edit latest comment 17 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion greetings the largest study of supercentenarians yet done can be found here http repository upenn edu dissertations aai3109224 note that among the validated data about 91 24 were female compare to the idl database about 90 female and the grg database about 89 female and the assertion that the ratio is about 9 1 is strong ryoung 122 09 06 15 february 2009 utc reply as requested edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion per your request the draft is here in it s entirety try to address the concerns some will be sound in history as soon as you can good luck with it sandahl talk 00 52 25 february 2009 utc reply thanks zodon talk 08 10 28 february 2009 utc reply simplified version of lonelypages edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion hey i was thinking lonelypages could look confusing to people who just want to get orphan tags off the articles in their project so i made a simplified version tagged orphans all it needs is the cat or template argument and it gives you all applicable tagged orphans what do you think ja ga talk 07 22 1 march 2009 utc reply draft of thoughts this is a list of tagged orphans pages with no links from other articles might still be well to note that this is on english language wikipedia in simplified version would it work to have a link that opens up more complex interface from the simpler one hide the extra selections but when click a link takes them to more powerful version maybe offer option to suppress the what is an orphan etc explanation at least on pages after the first one could be done as parameter so those who use regularly can suppress the extra text get the heading down to 4 or 5 lines leave the rest for listing why force 10 point text in the style would rather it defaulted to whatever the user preferred other thoughts way to generate a wikilist e g for project to keep track of what has hasn t been reviewed if hiding implemented show hidden non hidden either orphans zodon talk 09 03 5 march 2009 utc reply talk kill a watt claim about reading errors edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion just fyi it s been observed several times by several people google the subject matter but that forum posting was the most authoritative that i could find being an actual photograph of the test equipment in operation i can add half a dozen less good sources at least reports from several different people shows that it s not a single faulty unit but what exactly are we looking for it s not important enough news that the new york times is going to do a write up on the subject so expectations have to be limited 71 41 210 146 talk 21 23 11 april 2009 utc reply copied question to talk page of article will respond there zodon talk 01 25 12 april 2009 utc reply redlinks in see also section edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion in response to this undo i m all for redlinks but the mos section on layout says not to have them in the see also section the see also section should not link to pages that do not exist red links tedder talk 21 43 23 april 2009 utc reply okay thanks i missed that i will try to see how to work the link into the text zodon talk 21 46 23 april 2009 utc reply human equivalent edit latest comment 17 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion hi i crossed paths with you on the sustainability gardens article a person that was reffing their book multiple times there and that also originated that article also put the book on another article which they also originated this seems like an iffy matter to me human equivalent there is a discussion on the talk page your opinion skip sievert talk 16 16 15 may 2009 utc reply drug categorization consensus sought edit latest comment 17 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion should the 2nd 3rd and 4th levels of the category drugs by target organ system mirror the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system exactly or be consolidated when possible please read the more thorough description of this issue at wt pharm cat and post your comments there you re comments would be much appreciated thanks ἀνυπόδητος talk 09 15 4 june 2009 utc reply reproductive health edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion i ve added comments to talk reproductive_health name_change_to_sexual_and_reproductive_health would appreciate your feedback alexd talk 05 34 14 september 2009 utc reply thank you for the heads up you raise an interesting point i will respond further on the article talk page once i have time to think about it zodon talk 07 11 14 september 2009 utc reply can you edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion in the page safe sex you appear to have made a revision as of 08 57 12 september 2009 by adding text and citations to the article one of those citations is causing a cite error could you please go back and fill out the full source information for the reference tag ref name vittinghoff thanks 75 69 0 58 talk 19 29 15 september 2009 utc reply i just moved the text in question the citation error was already there in the version before i edited but i dug back and found the citation anyway and fixed the error zodon talk 09 23 16 september 2009 utc reply afd nomination of comparison of birth control methods edit latest comment 14 years ago 3 comments 3 people in discussion an editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on for deletion the nominated article is comparison of birth control methods we appreciate your contributions but the nominator doesn t believe that the article satisfies wikipedia s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his her nomination see also wikipedia notability and what wikipedia is not your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome please participate in the discussion s by adding your comments to wikipedia articles for deletion comparison of birth control methods please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes you may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article such removal will not end the deletion debate please note this is an automatic notification by a bot i have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination and can t do anything about it erwin85bot talk 01 06 23 october 2009 utc reply hi zodon i m new and don t even know if i m doing this right i just left a message for you on the comparison of birth control methods page and was wondering if you could help me out thank you very much sorry if i m totally doing this all wrong noodles addiction talk 04 23 15 february 2012 utc reply thanks for the heads up i responded there only suggestion would have been to put your message here in a new section since it wasn t about the afd would have been easier for me to find it worked well enough zodon talk 08 45 23 february 2012 utc reply womb veil edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion several of your comments have improved the new article womb veil and i appreciate your interest and experience in the broader subject area however i m concerned that you don t understand the topic which is not history of barrier contraception for women the topic is womb veil that is the form of barrier contraception introduced by edward bliss foote to the u s under that name in 1864 after which time it became the most common term in american english for certain forms of female barrier contraception after the first couple of decades of the 20th century the term disappears as birth control becomes more medicalized as far as i can determine the term was not used outside the u s it is a distinctive part of american discourse and american attitudes toward contraception in a very specific time period now you may well wish for an article that is broader in scope an article on history of barrier contraception for women would be a great addition to wikipedia you may dislike my choice of topic i ve written dozens of articles almost all of them on very precisely defined topics please visit my user page if you wish to see a list i stand by the quality of my work if you think the womb veil article should be deleted please propose that i suspect others will find it more interesting to read than you do to introduce the ancient egyptians into an article so clearly focused on the 19th and early 20th century u s or to ask for a worldwide perspective is preposterous it would be like insisting on adding quaker views of marriage to an article about ancient egyptian wedding rites in fact womb veil was written in conjunction with popular health movement both are specific to 19th century america so please stop trying to make the article into something it isn t this will never result in the very interesting and useful article you seem to want because the proportions of material will be unbalanced and the structure isn t there instead could i suggest that you write the article you have in mind i would be interested in contributing a section on barrier contraception in greco roman antiquity cynwolfe talk 16 15 20 april 2010 utc reply proposed deletion of reproductive life plan edit latest comment 16 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion the article reproductive life plan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern this is basically another article for a topic which is covered at family planning while all contributions to wikipedia are appreciated content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons you may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the dated prod notice but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article s talk page please consider improving the article to address the issues raised removing dated prod will stop the proposed deletion process but other deletion processes exist the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion kudpung talk 06 27 6 september 2010 utc reply i responded on article talk page thank you zodon talk 07 02 6 september 2010 utc reply opower entry edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion i noticed that you left a mark on the opower entry stating a concern that it is written too much like an advertisement i m new to wikipedia and would appreciate more feedback on that point specifically how the entry can be modified to address that concern i have started a discussion on the article s talk page please respond there thank you dag kdg talk 10 38 9 september 2010 utc reply hohm edit latest comment 16 years ago 4 comments 2 people in discussion i ve removed the criticism section again policy is clear about this if you want to keep it the onus is on you to find sources i don t have to justify it s removal as per wp v if you can find reliable sources then stick it back in cameron scott talk 08 04 21 september 2010 utc reply for an embrionic article like that leaving some material there or indication of what is needed may facilitate article improvement more than just deleting everything if there is nothing there folks won t know what to go look for and if you delete all the references even if they were misused originally people won t have as good leads of where to go to find information zodon talk 08 10 21 september 2010 utc reply with most content i wouldn t actually be bothered but criticism sections in tech article often revolve around five people with nothing better to do on a talk forum and that s why i want reliable sources as for the references yes i got that wrong cameron scott talk 08 37 21 september 2010 utc reply fair enough i definitely agree that anything dubious especially a criticism or a booster comment needs a source i looked at the items and they didn t seem unlikely as criticisms which is why i thought leaving them as a seed to gather citations might help but point taken about criticism sections b...
|
