Meta tags:
Headings (most frequently used words):
template, the, with, deprecated, link, it, ambox, does, this, really, in, talk, contents, category, questions, about, new, tdeprecated, format, word, for, those, not, familiar, multiple, replacements, pagename, vs, old, parameter, look, turkish, convert, to, confusion, changed, image, appear, main, name, space, or, put, documentation, process, missing, parallels, tfd, make, work, parameters, need, an, icon, dated, maintenance, categories, undiscussed, move,
Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (98), #template (66), utc (44), reply (41), this (37), talk (31), deprecated (29), comment (29), not (28), and (27), for (24), comments (24), with (23), that (23), edit (21), page (20), templates (19), ago (19), discussion (18), latest (18), years (18), new (18), use (17), category (17), documentation (13), september (13), should (11), people (11), which (11), add (10), used (10), old (10), why (10), 2010 (10), 2008 (10), ambox (10), wikipedia (9), other (9), have (9), tdeprecated (9), pagename (9), move (8), debresser (8), categories (8), one (8), tfd (8), please (8), when (8), about (7), would (7), april (7), just (7), really (7), work (7), process (7), div (7), 2007 (7), you (6), from (6), are (6), what (6), also (6), but (6), trialpears (6), july (6), person (6), put (6), link (6), topic (5), contents (5), code (5), text (5), will (5), only (5), pages (5), don (5), make (5), message (5), does (5), parameters (5), see (5), noinclude (5), doc (5), could (5), style (5), main (5), image (5), search (4), using (4), was (4), think (4), they (4), them (4), any (4), need (4), all (4), redirect (4), here (4), icon (4), fine (4), depiep (4), still (4), more (4), read (4), changes (4), august (4), parameter (4), top (4), includeonly (4), 2006 (4), hide (4), sidebar (4), table (3), view (3), policy (3), may (3), november (3), usage (3), 2021 (3), while (3), done (3), links (3), probably (3), some (3), than (3), undiscussed (3), 2020 (3), dated (3), maintenance (3), has (3), remove (3), 2018 (3), without (3), confusing (3), know (3), there (3), deprecation (3), then (3), look (3), because (3), example (3), type (3), article (3), thanks (3), name (3), changed (3), current (3), david (3), itself (3), below (3), sandbox (3), chris (3), cunningham (3), version (3), instead (3), date (3), turkish (3), get (3), new2 (3), new1 (3), multiple (3), replacements (3), word (3), those (3), familiar (3), format (3), tools (3), toggle (2), contact (2), privacy (2), under (2), terms (2), apply (2), non (2), namespaces (2), suggested (2), keep (2), modules (2), directly (2), articles (2), supposed (2), properly (2), automatically (2), seems (2), pointless (2), added (2), update (2), things (2), quite (2), problem (2), june (2), sense (2), can (2), objections (2), had (2), junior5a (2), been (2), december (2), 2013 (2), correctly (2), very (2), like (2), merging (2), deletion (2), missing (2), parallels (2), general (2), right (2), impression (2), good (2), clear (2), dropable (2), your (2), reference (2), merge (2), got (2), found (2), out (2), describe (2), every (2), reader (2), depending (2), dirty (2), laundry (2), imho (2), appear (2), space (2), jameslucas (2), göthberg (2), shows (2), warning (2), confusion (2), lots (2), since (2), lot (2), display (2), none (2), convert (2), february (2), boxes (2), implementation (2), conrad (2), pino (2), users (2), somewhere (2), george (2), bush (2), october (2), bar (2), bargled (2), arg (2), argled (2), 1px (2), term (2), free (2), questions (2), rholton (2), personal (2), help (2), learn (2), appearance (2), upload (2), file (2), history (2), languages (2), log (2), create (2), account (2), donate (2), menu (2), mobile, cookie, statement, statistics, developers, conduct, legal, safety, contacts, disclaimers, available, additional, site, agree, registered, trademark, profit, organization, wikimedia, foundation, inc, creative, commons, attribution, sharealike, license, rendered, parsoid, last, edited, 2024, retrieved, https, org, index, php, title, template_talk, deprecated_template, oldid, 1258425672, moved, back, stuff, response, uses, depreciated, around, called, editors, running, across, idea, files, accomplish, coded, works, adds, prefix, onto, names, inputted, fixing, best, given, mover, didn, come, discuss, now, reverted, 192, historical, recently, real, issues, categorize, making, rename, inline, jsfasdf252, seen, most, having, single, member, function, posting, considering, low, traffic, nature, wpt, week, applies, notbroken, aware, cont, cattle, stage, lojbanist, removed, updated, did, alternatively, surprise, took, thinking, trial, error, these, edits, even, ends, dozens, connection, grand, includes, merged, both, technics, front, upon, few, advisable, tags, getting, beginning, fact, never, suggest, stupid, enough, sorts, specified, relevant, being, preceding, contribs, unsigned, initial, question, further, mixed, unannounced, similar, named, after, subst, diff, parallel, maybe, something, browser, whether, first, guess, potential, editor, addition, helps, drawing, attention, says, box, appears, flabbergasted, casual, doesn, our, washing, public, reflect, imperfect, strategic, approach, better, place, hidden, addressed, systematic, way, reading, spreading, joy, over, today, stylized, exclamation, point, keeping, trends, chat, droll, awesome, hehe, second, thus, clarify, its, fix, spent, ten, minutes, trying, determine, sure, bit, saying, yes, gave, major, overhaul, upgraded, kind, shown, fixed, course, tested, before, deployed, tricky, mbox, meant, messagebox, removing, request, until, input, elsewhere, shouldn, amboxed, nihiltres, drop, symbol, opinion, vote, svg, 40px, small, replace, ifeq, articlespace, rather, hand, hacked, 180, 116, şablon, geçersizş, note, january, ms2ger, however, structure, buggy, fails, failure, examples, ready, production, testcases, once, orphaned, notifying, user, pathoschild, admin, transcluding, necessary, adding, anywhere, dream, loud, modified, above, show, cat, 2009, farmbrough, rich, ksero, border, solid, ccc, padding, idiom, candidates, replacing, linked, where, description, moment, inexperienced, means, providing, explanation, whole, gurch, linking, helpful, zyxw, how, replaced, solutions, allowed, shtak, pagra, qif, advantage, categorizing, month, left, monthly, possibly, many, holding, two, soft, suppose, makes, toth, seek, needed, dispute, resolution, welcoming, newcomers, avoid, attacks, polite, assume, faith, welcome, start, discussing, improvements, encyclopedia, projects, printable, download, pdf, print, export, switch, legacy, parser, shortened, url, information, permanent, related, actions, english, supported, special, recent, community, portal, contribute, random, events, navigation, jump, content,
Text of the page (random words):
template talk deprecated template wikipedia jump to content main menu main menu move to sidebar hide navigation main page contents current events random article about wikipedia contact us contribute help learn to edit community portal recent changes upload file special pages search search appearance donate create account log in personal tools donate create account log in contents move to sidebar hide top 1 category 3 comments 2 questions about the new tdeprecated format 1 comment 3 link the word deprecated for those not familiar with it 2 comments 4 multiple replacements 2 comments 5 pagename vs old parameter 1 comment 6 ambox look 3 comments 7 turkish link 2 comments 8 convert to ambox 4 comments 9 confusion 3 comments 10 changed image 1 comment 11 does this template really appear in the main name space 1 comment 12 or put it in documentation 6 comments 13 process missing parallels with tfd 1 comment 14 make work with parameters 2 comments 15 does this template really need an icon 3 comments 16 dated maintenance categories 3 comments 17 undiscussed move 3 comments toggle the table of contents template talk deprecated template add languages page contents not supported in other languages add topic template talk english read edit view history tools tools move to sidebar hide actions read edit add topic view history general what links here related changes upload file permanent link page information get shortened url switch to legacy parser print export download as pdf printable version in other projects appearance move to sidebar hide from wikipedia the free encyclopedia latest comment 5 years ago by trialpears in topic undiscussed move this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the deprecated template template add new text under old text new to wikipedia welcome learn to edit get help start a new topic assume good faith be polite and avoid personal attacks be welcoming to newcomers seek dispute resolution if needed category edit latest comment 19 years ago 3 comments 2 people in discussion why is this template in category redirect templates it s not for use on a redirect page is it rholton 02 50 3 september 2006 utc reply probably because it s a soft redirect a z a toth 18 20 21 september 2006 utc reply i see i suppose that makes sense thanks rholton 18 43 23 september 2006 utc reply questions about the new tdeprecated format edit latest comment 19 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion what is the advantage of categorizing deprecated templates by month we ll just be left with a lot of monthly categories possibly many only holding one or two templates how does one use the new format for templates that are replaced with non template solutions for example qif the old version allowed free text to describe replacements pagra shtak 17 48 14 october 2006 utc reply link the word deprecated for those not familiar with it edit latest comment 19 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion any objections to linking the word deprecated in this template it would be helpful for those not familiar with the term zyxw 18 48 22 february 2007 utc reply i ve linked it to the category page where i ll add a description in a moment which should make it clear to inexperienced users what the term means while also providing an explanation of the whole process gurch 15 47 12 april 2007 utc reply multiple replacements edit latest comment 16 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion i found this idiom somewhere that can be used when there are multiple candidates for replacing an old template div style border 1px solid ccc padding 1px tdeprecated old new one of the templates below category template new1 new1 for when the arg is argled template new2 new2 for when the bar is bargled div the template old is deprecated please use one of the templates below instead new1 for when the arg is argled new2 for when the bar is bargled ksero 21 38 27 may 2007 utc reply modified above to show code and remove cat rich farmbrough 11 55 1 october 2009 utc reply pagename vs old parameter edit latest comment 19 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion why is it necessary to have to type in the name of the template for the old parameter i think that adding pagename should be fine because the template will not be used anywhere but the template s page itself dream out loud talk 00 09 2 july 2007 utc reply this template is used on the template page and once orphaned every page transcluding it this shows users a message notifying them that the template is deprecated when they use it somewhere if we only use pagename the user will get a message like the template george w bush is deprecated when they add it to george w bush admin pathoschild 03 16 52 02 july 2007 utc ambox look edit latest comment 18 years ago 3 comments 2 people in discussion the tdeprecated sandbox has an ambox implementation tdeprecated sandbox conrad t pino 10 47 12 november 2007 utc reply however the div structure in the implementation is buggy and fails with ambox use see tdeprecated testcases for failure examples not ready for production conrad t pino 11 57 12 november 2007 utc reply please note that ambox is for article message boxes not for template message boxes ms2ger talk 20 46 13 january 2008 utc reply turkish link edit latest comment 18 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion could you please add the turkish link tr şablon geçersizş 78 180 58 116 talk 10 22 28 february 2008 utc reply done chris cunningham not at work talk 11 21 12 april 2008 utc reply convert to ambox edit latest comment 18 years ago 4 comments 3 people in discussion rather than using a hand hacked table use an ambox directly new code ambox type warning image image symbol opinion vote svg 40px text if new 2 div style display none the template template pagename pagename is category deprecated templates deprecated please use use template 1 1 instead br small this usage is deprecated please replace it with tdeprecated pagename 1 if new 2 includeonly category category deprecated use of tdeprecated includeonly new usage with or without date if new 2 div div style display none the template template 1 1 is deprecated please use new template 2 2 if 3 3 instead if new 2 div includeonly category ifeq articlespace template if date category templates deprecated since date pagename category deprecated templates pagename category pages using deprecated templates includeonly noinclude documentation template noinclude just drop the lot in chris cunningham not at work talk 11 21 12 april 2008 utc reply ambox is supposed to be used in articles not elsewhere the current version is fine and shouldn t be amboxed nihiltres t l 15 23 12 april 2008 utc reply do h i meant messagebox still removing request until there s been more input chris cunningham not at work talk 15 42 12 april 2008 utc reply i just gave this template a major overhaul i upgraded it to use the new mbox that automatically changes style depending on what kind of page it is shown on and i fixed lots and lots of other things in the code and i of course tested it in the sandbox before i deployed it since this was a tricky update david göthberg talk 17 10 17 august 2008 utc reply confusion edit latest comment 18 years ago 3 comments 2 people in discussion i just spent about ten minutes trying to determine if this template is deprecated or not and i m still not sure could we add a noinclude bit at the very top of the page saying below is an example of this template this page is not really deprecated or yes this deprecation template is itself deprecated jameslucas 16 39 17 august 2008 utc reply hehe this template itself is not deprecated but using it without the second parameter is deprecated thus at the top of the page it shows a warning about that which is confusing and you are right we should clarify that at the top of its documentation i ll fix that david göthberg talk 17 13 17 august 2008 utc reply awesome thanks david jameslucas 20 36 17 august 2008 utc reply changed image edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion i changed the stylized exclamation point image to one that imho is more in keeping with current trends droll chat 10 14 7 july 2010 utc reply does this template really appear in the main name space edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion the documentation for this template says that the box style changes depending on which type of page the template appears i m flabbergasted the casual reader doesn t need to see our dirty laundry washing dirty laundry in public reflect an imperfect strategic approach imho it would be better to place the article in a hidden category then the problem could be addressed in a more systematic way thanks of reading this seems i just spreading joy all over today 10 30 7 july 2010 utc in wikipedia every reader is a potential editor in addition it helps drawing attention debresser talk 11 43 7 july 2010 utc reply or put it in documentation edit latest comment 16 years ago 6 comments 2 people in discussion could the documentation describe whether this template should or should not be put in the doc page my first guess if the template is still in used it should be in the doc which is in the noinclude depiep talk 11 26 1 september 2010 utc reply in general tdeprecated should not be put on the documentation page but right in front of the template it is used upon if that template is still in use on more than a few pages it is advisable to add noinclude tags debresser talk 12 45 1 september 2010 utc reply then please put this in this templates doc depiep talk 19 35 1 september 2010 utc reply why am i getting the impression from the beginning in fact that you never had a good look at the documentation page for this template debresser talk 22 00 1 september 2010 utc reply i don t know why you got that impression maybe something in your browser i do know that i have read used this template and that further on the process got mixed up with the tfd process unannounced for example if i apply this template in which categories will be the template why do i see dropable templates in other similar named categories but not my template and if i have found out after a subst probably why a diff with tfd deletion why no reference to the tfd merge which is quite parallel to deprecation then please re read my initial question why not put it in doc just don t suggest i m stupid it could be that the doc is not clear enough depiep talk 23 10 1 september 2010 utc reply which categories this template sorts in is specified in the documentation what are dropable templates and which is your template why no reference to tfd merge because merging is relevant with templates that are in use while this template is to be used when a template is being deprecated preceding unsigned comment added by debresser talk contribs 09 36 2 september 2010 utc reply process missing parallels with tfd edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion i used this template here but it is very confusing i do not even know in which category the templates ends up why is the template not in category templates for deletion which has dozens of pages also there is no connection with the grand wp tfd templates for discussion policy which includes merging i would like the process of deprecation to be merged with the tfd process both by technics and by documentation depiep talk 19 44 1 september 2010 utc reply make work with parameters edit latest comment 12 years ago 2 comments 1 person in discussion this template did not work correctly with the parameters 1 2 4 and 5 or alternatively parameters old and new to my surprise to make it work with them correctly took some thinking and some trial and error see these edits debresser talk 04 15 9 december 2013 utc reply parameters 4 and 5 have been removed from the code use old and new documentation updated debresser talk 16 53 28 december 2013 utc reply does this template really need an icon edit latest comment 7 years ago 3 comments 3 people in discussion junior5a lojbanist remove cattle from stage 18 44 29 september 2018 utc reply it would keep it to aware about icon if you would without it would be confusing junior5a talk cont 18 49 29 september 2018 utc reply the icon we had a week ago was fine and the new one is fine also wp notbroken applies debresser talk 21 54 29 september 2018 utc reply dated maintenance categories edit latest comment 6 years ago 3 comments 2 people in discussion dated maintenance categories really don t make sense here as can be seen at category deprecated templates with most of the categories only having a single member if no one has any objections i will remove this function and only have one category for them all also posting a message at wt wpt considering the low traffic nature of this page trialpears talk 21 49 30 june 2020 utc reply no problem here debresser talk 21 51 30 june 2020 utc reply done trialpears talk 22 28 8 july 2020 utc reply undiscussed move edit latest comment 5 years ago 3 comments 2 people in discussion jsfasdf252 recently move this template from deprecated template to just deprecated while i don t have any real issues with this i really think it should be done properly or not at all we should update redirect links in the documentation deprecated inline all the categorize and probably some other links i also don t think this template should be used on things other than templates and modules making the rename quite pointless trialpears talk 23 36 28 april 2021 utc reply trialpears i think it should be moved back for stuff in other namespaces we have template historical and in response the suggested other uses that they added to the documentation we do not keep depreciated modules around as they are not called directly in articles so editors will not be running across them and i have no idea what the suggested use on files is supposed to accomplish the template is coded so that it only works properly on template pages e g it automatically adds a template prefix onto any names inputted to it so that would also need fixing but the usage on other namespaces seems pointless at best 192 76 8 91 talk 00 10 29 april 2021 utc reply given that the mover didn t come to discuss i have now reverted trialpears talk 23 37 1 may 2021 utc reply retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title template_talk deprecated_template oldid 1258425672 this page was last edited on 19 november 2024 at 17 33 utc page was rendered with parsoid text is available under the creative commons attribution sharealike 4 0 license additional terms may apply by using this site you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy wikipedia is a registered trademark of the wikimedia foundation inc a non profit organization privacy policy about wikipedia disclaimers contact wikipedia legal safety contacts code of conduct developers statistics cookie statement mobile view search search toggle the table of contents template talk deprecated template add topic
|
