Meta tags:

Headings (most frequently used words):

distributed, template, talk, parallel, computing, contents, notifications, questions, shared, memory, pvm, thread, safety, add, frameworks, regarding, hardware, section,

Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (52), talk (37), #computing (33), you (33), and (33), utc (30), reply (29), october (25), 2008 (25), parallel (22), not (21), that (18), template (15), are (15), technologies (13), wikipedia (12), this (12), distributed (12), comment (12), page (11), edit (11), all (10), discussion (10), one (10), add (9), should (9), ramu50 (9), what (9), have (8), comments (8), there (8), for (8), memory (8), about (7), from (7), latest (7), years (7), ago (7), cpu (7), here (7), was (6), with (6), please (6), letdorf (6), people (6), other (6), multiple (6), think (6), georgewilliamherbert (6), topic (5), contents (5), search (5), frameworks (5), links (5), shared (5), flynn (5), can (5), article (5), related (5), single (5), trying (5), hardware (5), safety (4), under (4), link (4), taxonomy (4), most (4), concepts (4), don (4), read (4), relevant (4), raul654 (4), well (4), which (4), just (4), sentence (4), section (4), hide (4), move (4), sidebar (4), toggle (3), view (3), policy (3), use (3), articles (3), pages (3), could (3), your (3), person (3), august (3), thread (3), navbox (3), does (3), would (3), more (3), but (3), system (3), these (3), every (3), also (3), lifo (3), fifo (3), computer (3), mimo (3), them (3), knowledge (3), microarchitecture (3), they (3), even (3), say (3), personal (3), many (3), has (3), been (3), participate (3), technical (3), information (3), account (3), technology (3), processing (3), notifications (3), wikiproject (3), tools (3), main (3), table (2), statement (2), contact (2), privacy (2), terms (2), class (2), categories (2), such (2), useful (2), know (2), lokeshravindranathan (2), apache (2), 2009 (2), pvm (2), yes (2), scope (2), type (2), guess (2), didn (2), see (2), because (2), rilak (2), describing (2), might (2), work (2), aren (2), any (2), others (2), complex (2), numa (2), coma (2), very (2), basic (2), belong (2), siso (2), why (2), maybe (2), confusing (2), before (2), completely (2), were (2), when (2), certainly (2), first (2), architecture (2), inputs (2), outputs (2), output (2), input (2), simo (2), then (2), true (2), processors (2), utilize (2), those (2), opinion (2), too (2), some (2), lot (2), problems (2), english (2), mistake (2), make (2), way (2), judge (2), entire (2), life (2), classify (2), contributions (2), understand (2), favor (2), bias (2), than (2), understanding (2), things (2), gap (2), get (2), like (2), subsection (2), questions (2), vector (2), directly (2), expand (2), programming (2), navigation (2), regarding (2), stream (2), procesing (2), content (2), appearance (2), upload (2), file (2), changes (2), history (2), languages (2), log (2), create (2), donate (2), menu (2), mobile, cookie, statistics, developers, code, conduct, legal, contacts, disclaimers, text, available, additional, may, apply, using, site, agree, registered, trademark, non, profit, organization, wikimedia, foundation, inc, creative, commons, attribution, sharealike, license, rendered, parsoid, last, edited, july, 2024, importance, retrieved, https, org, index, php, title, template_talk, parallel_computing, oldid, 1234701583, sure, added, deemed, let, scribe, thoughts, february, 2015, spark, hadoop, thinking, 2010, adamd1008, fair, point, done, 124, 239, 162, virtual, machine, definitely, tweaking, sake, clarity, oops, appropriate, wasn, already, mentioned, misunderstand, designer, classification, instruction, streams, data, sets, time, gives, four, possibilities, multi, must, fit, into, model, analyzing, jeh, fundamental, theory, much, hand, science, terminology, used, electronics, mention, mimd, simd, ramu, love, god, recommending, remove, obviously, wrote, technically, accurate, best, featured, therefore, methodology, categorization, based, empirically, kinds, prevalent, 70s, devised, pedagogical, basis, teaching, learned, during, week, miso, above, wrong, consequently, anything, arrays, design, multiplexing, totally, taxtonomy, etc, methodologies, implementations, fact, grid, doesn, prove, though, industry, computational, types, sciences, corporation, how, product, being, built, mixing, look, through, third, parseable, whatever, properly, constructed, understandable, closest, come, parsing, dispute, histories, sense, local, global, context, meant, clear, thing, referring, someone, close, minded, second, entirely, everyone, else, business, contributing, highly, making, appear, destroying, disruptive, called, vandalism, assume, intentional, resistance, listening, pointing, out, stretching, credibility, now, attack, against, repeatedly, warned, keep, yourself, spreading, own, mental, upon, expertise, totalyl, none, buisness, got, problem, contribs, later, mistakes, reason, deeds, closeminded, thinkings, mine, weren, thinks, less, begin, load, crap, attitude, showing, evidence, familiar, college, student, level, conceptual, several, safe, organize, clearly, either, education, case, need, spend, while, studying, horrible, communications, studied, topics, educational, background, explain, stop, editing, templates, fields, pfister, clusters, back, talking, everything, named, since, shorten, coherency, each, details, navigated, guys, delete, multitasking, operating, unrelated, preemptive, multitaksing, part, currently, reasonably, except, wondering, decrease, amount, present, processor, will, overloaded, adding, try, only, onto, method, warp, aka, threads, base, originated, event, driven, orientated, thus, gpu, concerned, kernel, engineering, scheduling, mechanism, within, collaborative, effort, improve, coverage, visit, project, where, join, list, open, tasks, computers, require, rating, scale, interest, following, wikiprojects, assessment, free, encyclopedia, projects, printable, version, download, pdf, print, export, switch, legacy, parser, shortened, url, permanent, general, actions, supported, top, special, recent, community, portal, learn, help, contribute, random, current, events, jump,

Text of the page (random words):
template talk parallel computing wikipedia jump to content main menu main menu move to sidebar hide navigation main page contents current events random article about wikipedia contact us contribute help learn to edit community portal recent changes upload file special pages search search appearance donate create account log in personal tools donate create account log in contents move to sidebar hide top 1 notifications 4 comments toggle notifications subsection 1 1 regarding hardware section 2 questions 17 comments 3 distributed shared memory 4 comments 4 pvm 2 comments 5 thread safety 1 comment 6 add distributed frameworks 1 comment toggle the table of contents template talk parallel computing add languages page contents not supported in other languages add topic template talk english read edit view history tools tools move to sidebar hide actions read edit add topic view history general what links here related changes upload file permanent link page information get shortened url switch to legacy parser print export download as pdf printable version in other projects appearance move to sidebar hide from wikipedia the free encyclopedia latest comment 11 years ago by lokeshravindranathan in topic add distributed frameworks this template does not require a rating on wikipedia s content assessment scale it is of interest to the following wikiprojects computing this template is within the scope of wikiproject computing a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers computing and information technology on wikipedia if you would like to participate please visit the project page where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks computing wikipedia wikiproject computing template wikiproject computing computing notifications edit latest comment 17 years ago 4 comments 3 people in discussion please don t add stream procesing onto parallel computing stream processing is a method of procesing warp aka threads base on originated from event driven orientated programming these technologies are thus use on some gpu processors and they are more concerned with the kernel engineering and scheduling mechanism of the microarchitecture of a cpu than directly related to the parallel computing template ramu50 talk 18 21 22 october 2008 utc reply regarding hardware section edit i am wondering should we decrease the amount of links in the hardware section because most of the technologies present in hardware are directly related to processor technologies and if we expand it the template will be overloaded also when adding programming section i think we should try to add only navigation articles and not expand every single one of them ramu50 talk 18 23 22 october 2008 utc reply i think all the links currently under hardware are reasonably relevant to parallel computing except maybe vector processing letdorf talk 21 35 22 october 2008 utc reply vector processing is most certainly a parallel computing topic raul654 talk 21 36 22 october 2008 utc reply questions edit latest comment 17 years ago 17 comments 5 people in discussion is preemptive multitaksing part of parallel computing ramu50 talk 22 18 20 october 2008 utc reply no it s an operating system technology not a cpu computer architecture technology completely unrelated georgewilliamherbert talk 20 07 22 october 2008 utc reply i guess we should we delete computer multitasking from the navbox then letdorf talk 21 26 22 october 2008 utc reply since the template has a lot too technical cpu technologies that aren t even relevant to parallel computing at all things like numa coma distributed memory shared memory we should just shorten up to coherency and each of technical details be navigated under the subsection of the article what you guys think ramu50 talk 02 07 23 october 2008 utc reply what are you talking about everything you just named is related to distributed computing raul654 talk 02 10 23 october 2008 utc reply those are all relevant to parallel computing why would you think they weren t georgewilliamherbert talk 02 11 23 october 2008 utc reply ramu50 can you do me a favor please go read pfister s in search of clusters and get back to us georgewilliamherbert talk 02 13 23 october 2008 utc reply what make you thinks that all other have a less knowledge than you to even begin with load of crap on bias contributions attitude ramu50 talk 02 24 23 october 2008 utc reply you are not showing evidence that you re familiar with basic college student level conceptual understanding of several technologies you re trying to classify here it is not safe to be trying to organize things you do not clearly understand either there is a concepts understanding education gap here in which case you need to go spend a while studying or there s a horrible communications gap here if you have studied the topics and have the educational background please explain so if you have not please stop editing templates in these fields georgewilliamherbert talk 02 58 23 october 2008 utc reply and do us a favor and keep that bias comment to yourself before spreading more of your own mental problems upon others my expertise of knowledge is totalyl none of buisness if you got a problem contribs at my talk page for later discussion by the way if one mistakes account for all the reason to judge one person s every deeds of an entire life of that closeminded thinkings you mine as well not participate in a discussion at all ramu50 talk 03 27 23 october 2008 utc reply the first sentence there is a personal attack which is against wikipedia policy about which you have been repeatedly warned the second sentence is entirely my and everyone else s business you are contributing and trying to classify highly technical complex articles in wikipedia and making contributions that appear to be destroying or confusing information this is disruptive and could be called vandalism i assume that this is not intentional that you just don t understand it but your resistance to listening to many many people pointing this out is stretching credibility now the third sentence is not parseable whatever you were trying to say the sentence was not properly constructed english and is not understandable georgewilliamherbert talk 03 37 23 october 2008 utc reply i think he was trying to say by the way if you judge someone s entire life from one mistake you are close minded and might as well not participate in this discussion at all raul654 talk 04 00 23 october 2008 utc reply that was the closest i could come to parsing it as well but there has been no one mistake in the edit dispute histories and it didn t make sense in local or global context if that s what he meant i am not clear what one thing he s referring to georgewilliamherbert talk 04 13 23 october 2008 utc reply that is totally not true flynn s taxtonomy mimo simo lifo fifo etc are all methodologies of processors microarchitecture implementations technologies the fact that parallel computing distributed computing and grid computing utilize those technologies doesn t prove they are parallel computing technologies at all even though the industry say so what type of technologies you computational technologies you utilize from other types of sciences is a personal opinion or a corporation opinion of how a product is being built i think too many people is mixing it up i just look through some of the talk page and there has been a lot of problems on the talk on lifo and fifo well if my above statement is wrong then consequently anything that is a microarchitecture arrays design such as should also be parallel computing which is not true multiplexing siso single input single output simo single input multiple outputs miso multiple inputs single output mimo multiple inputs multiple outputs ramu50 talk 02 21 23 october 2008 utc reply ramu for the love of god read the parallel computing article before recommending we remove links from this template that obviously belong i wrote parallel computing article it s completely technically accurate to the best of my knowledge and it s a featured article you can t do flynn s taxonomy therefore it is not a methodology it s a system of categorization based empirically on the kinds of technologies that were prevalent in the 70s when he devised it and it is most certainly related to parallel computing it s the pedagogical basis for teaching parallel computing i learned about it during my first week in my parallel architecture class that s what it s relevant here raul654 talk 02 52 23 october 2008 utc reply yes flynn s taxonomy is one of the most fundamental concepts of parallel computing theory numa coma and distributed shared memory are also very much parallel computing concepts on the other hand lifo and fifo are very basic concepts in computer science and don t belong here mimo and siso are terminology used in rf electronics so i don t know why you mention them here maybe you are confusing them with mimd and simd letdorf talk 09 43 23 october 2008 utc reply ramu50 as i mentioned on the cpu technologies talk page you misunderstand what flynn s taxonomy is about it is not describing technologies that a designer might use or not it is a classification system you can work on one or multiple instruction streams and you can work on one or multiple data sets at a time that gives four possibilities and there aren t any others every cpu or multi cpu complex must fit into one of these flynn s taxonomy is a useful model for analyzing and describing any cpu jeh talk 16 17 23 october 2008 utc reply distributed shared memory edit latest comment 17 years ago 4 comments 2 people in discussion should the navbox have a link to distributed shared memory rilak talk 06 13 27 october 2008 utc reply but it does already letdorf talk 11 00 27 october 2008 utc reply oops so it does would it be more appropriate for it to be under memory with the other memory type links i guess i didn t see it because it wasn t there rilak talk 05 23 28 october 2008 utc reply yes there s definitely scope for tweaking the categories in this template for the sake of clarity letdorf talk 13 07 28 october 2008 utc reply pvm edit latest comment 17 years ago 2 comments 2 people in discussion should the navbox have a link to parallel virtual machine 85 124 239 162 talk 15 31 27 august 2009 utc reply fair point done letdorf talk 12 55 28 august 2009 utc reply thread safety edit latest comment 16 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion i was thinking should this template have a link to thread safety adamd1008 talk 01 33 23 august 2010 utc reply add distributed frameworks edit latest comment 11 years ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion i am not sure if distributed frameworks should be added to parallel computing distributed frameworks such as apache hadoop and apache spark could be deemed useful in this template page please let me know or scribe in my talk page about your thoughts lokeshravindranathan 05 13 16 february 2015 utc reply retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title template_talk parallel_computing oldid 1234701583 categories template class computing pages na importance computing pages all computing articles this page was last edited on 15 july 2024 at 18 18 utc page was rendered with parsoid text is available under the creative commons attribution sharealike 4 0 license additional terms may apply by using this site you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy wikipedia is a registered trademark of the wikimedia foundation inc a non profit organization privacy policy about wikipedia disclaimers contact wikipedia legal safety contacts code of conduct developers statistics cookie statement mobile view search search toggle the table of contents template talk parallel computing add topic