Meta tags:

Headings (most frequently used words):

template, help, removal, the, when, to, remove, navigation, tools, maintenance, contents, overview, addressing, flagged, problem, not, changing, specific, guidance, still, need, see, also, menu, an, example, researching, tagged, issue, personal, namespaces, views, search, contribute, print, export, languages,

Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (385), and (149), #template (106), that (100), sources (87), article (82), this (69), not (69), you (64), wikipedia (60), for (55), issue (50), when (47), are (43), #maintenance (42), citations (41), help (40), templates (40), ref (40), citation (38), may (37), topic (37), page (34), references (34), reliable (33), with (30), articles (30), inline (29), remove (28), such (28), should (27), 2022 (25), june (25), but (25), have (24), more (22), all (22), how (21), name (20), content (20), some (20), links (19), section (19), used (19), code (19), notability (19), use (18), pages (18), date (18), which (18), placed (18), has (18), secondary (18), text (17), edit (17), what (17), tag (17), multiple (17), using (16), source (16), removal (16), can (16), please (16), material (16), information (15), example (15), flagged (15), address (15), been (15), cite (15), primary (15), about (14), learn (14), see (14), specific (14), reading (14), lead (14), adding (14), current (13), talk (13), typically (13), message (13), will (13), one (13), must (13), other (12), issues (12), any (12), like (12), flags (11), having (11), removed (11), news (11), sourcing (11), guidelines (11), just (11), removing (11), link (10), through (10), unreferenced (10), displaying (10), editing (10), note (10), there (10), neutral (10), common (10), view (9), discussion (9), redirects (9), reference (9), also (9), need (9), without (9), contains (9), independent (9), support (9), problems (9), problem (9), related (8), from (8), user (8), general (8), then (8), guidance (8), event (8), longer (8), they (8), improve (8), does (8), policies (8), pov (8), others (8), detail (8), guide (8), display (8), verifiability (7), type (7), first (7), urls (7), following (7), these (7), subject (7), want (7), after (7), consensus (7), lack (7), point (7), two (7), find (7), directly (7), appear (7), below (7), challenged (7), addressed (7), non (6), read (6), documentation (6), topics (6), style (6), its (6), most (6), bare (6), appropriate (6), generally (6), establish (6), notable (6), added (6), only (6), appears (6), written (6), books (6), understand (6), original (6), form (6), tags (6), separate (6), reflist (6), footnote (6), each (6), method (6), because (6), footnotes (6), your (6), additional (5), was (5), changes (5), main (5), search (5), linking (5), deletion (5), cleanup (5), formatting (5), still (5), found (5), would (5), followed (5), seen (5), contain (5), many (5), format (5), web (5), change (5), them (5), instead (5), time (5), often (5), add (5), than (5), body (5), summary (5), good (5), including (5), given (5), resolved (5), significant (5), rather (5), exist (5), substantive (5), treat (5), mere (5), whether (5), addressing (5), citing (5), jstor (5), scholar (5), thus (5), our (5), being (5), synthesis (5), order (5), referencing (5), refimprove (5), care (5), policy (4), available (4), contents (4), navigation (4), short (4), top (4), external (4), messages (4), fix (4), access (4), depending (4), url (4), make (4), verifiable (4), meant (4), listed (4), editors (4), edits (4), reader (4), containing (4), important (4), interest (4), neutrality (4), different (4), fairly (4), relevant (4), promotional (4), treatment (4), manner (4), denominator (4), their (4), provide (4), encyclopedia (4), mentions (4), stated (4), newspapers (4), where (4), involved (4), place (4), analysis (4), text3 (4), text2 (4), mode (4), opening (4), closing (4), slash (4), single (4), simply (4), word (4), visual (4), sections (4), core (4), imply (4), research (4), once (4), unsourced (4), take (4), fixed (4), click (4), above (4), belong (4), reasonably (4), under (3), apply (3), site (3), english (3), file (3), here (3), tools (3), namespaces (3), personal (3), org (3), php (3), category (3), namespace (3), examples (3), icons (3), speedy (3), introduction (3), language (3), standard (3), needs (3), itself (3), located (3), displayed (3), tagged (3), descriptive (3), consider (3), linkrot (3), attention (3), changing (3), state (3), numerous (3), who (3), published (3), however (3), become (3), free (3), well (3), overview (3), why (3), needed (3), missing (3), dormant (3), quality (3), until (3), sourced (3), means (3), forth (3), case (3), tell (3), advertisement (3), advert (3), insufficient (3), treating (3), remember (3), much (3), mention (3), those (3), verify (3), newspaper (3), etc (3), likely (3), guideline (3), ones (3), close (3), statements (3), verified (3), produces (3), either (3), again (3), preferred (3), don (3), seeing (3), whose (3), contentious (3), living (3), persons (3), demonstrated (3), nature (3), cited (3), presented (3), reach (3), conclusion (3), unless (3), switch (3), might (3), leave (3), discrete (3), brought (3), cases (3), editor (3), usually (3), conflict (3), fixing (3), tagging (3), explanatory (3), volunteers (3), contact (2), disclaimers (2), privacy (2), terms (2), organization (2), wikimedia (2), simple (2), version (2), permanent (2), upload (2), recent (2), random (2), events (2), views (2), hidden (2), categories (2), https (2), index (2), title (2), maintenance_template_removal (2), wikiproject (2), requested (2), userspace (2), userboxes (2), noticeboard (2), notices (2), proposed (2), infoboxes (2), notice (2), desk (2), hatnotes (2), review (2), age (2), archive (2), stub (2), lists (2), disputes (2), done (2), try (2), users (2), questions (2), could (2), seek (2), interface (2), visit (2), accompanying (2), into (2), placement (2), noted (2), provides (2), researching (2), restore (2), contextual (2), rot (2), structure (2), underlying (2), full (2), accessible (2), addition (2), ensure (2), remains (2), assist (2), described (2), merely (2), variation (2), great (2), immediately (2), breaking (2), reports (2), serious (2), discuss (2), updates (2), valid (2), reflect (2), unreliable (2), documents (2), paragraphs (2), already (2), present (2), introducing (2), identify (2), context (2), absence (2), explanation (2), talkpage (2), npov (2), balance (2), represent (2), identifying (2), tone (2), editorial (2), leaving (2), existence (2), build (2), creator (2), higher (2), levels (2), encyclopedic (2), g11 (2), give (2), press (2), amount (2), overcome (2), substantively (2), passing (2), moreover (2), actually (2), among (2), useful (2), facts (2), looking (2), third (2), parties (2), requires (2), number (2), demonstrate (2), coverage (2), cannot (2), deleted (2), knowledge (2), attempting (2), taken (2), pay (2), com (2), request (2), replacing (2), predominantly (2), too (2), relies (2), carefully (2), person (2), further (2), tertiary (2), journal (2), book (2), between (2), _________________ (2), save (2), software (2), commonly (2), modified (2), columns (2), colwidth (2), 30em (2), per (2), denominated (2), brief (2), anywhere (2), piece (2), bottom (2), element (2), elements (2), particular (2), mined (2), takes (2), clicked (2), set (2), copy (2), instruction (2), suggest (2), starting (2), noting (2), guides (2), tutorials (2), placing (2), beginners (2), ideally (2), quotations (2), negative (2), positive (2), include (2), supports (2), minimum (2), lacks (2), remain (2), judgement (2), currently (2), nor (2), applies (2), made (2), thoroughly (2), depth (2), host (2), appearing (2), even (2), poor (2), 2009 (2), march (2), 2011 (2), orphan (2), entirely (2), three (2), flag (2), another (2), gone (2), applicable (2), delete (2), blue (2), wikitext (2), considered (2), paid (2), shortcuts (2), matter (2), never (2), associated (2), location (2), did (2), someone (2), else (2), whatever (2), effort (2), efforts (2), automatically (2), clicking (2), mtr (2), jump (2), cookie, statement, statistics, developers, mobile, agree, registered, trademark, profit, foundation, inc, creative, commons, attribution, sharealike, license, last, edited, utc, اردو, türkçe, ไทย, తెలుగు, српски, srpski, کوردی, سنڌي, සිංහල, português, bahasa, indonesia, ગુજરાતી, français, فارسی, dansk, বাংলা, العربية, languages, printable, download, pdf, print, export, wikidata, item, special, community, portal, contribute, donate, history, log, create, account, contributions, logged, menu, semi, protected, project, description, administration, retrieved, oldid, 1089112734, emoji, comment, images, wikilove, wikibreak, rights, unicode, transwiki, icon, sup, sub, string, handling, semantics, quotation, protection, mergers, warnings, math, ipa, editnotice, header, button, birth, death, navboxes, sister, projects, splitting, codes, functional, redirect, moving, merging, banners, compact, toc, translation, types, boxes, quick, country, confused, asking, designed, new, ask, alternatively, live, assistance, irc, channel, teahouse, searching, exists, way, thereby, field, lines, parameter, previously, additionally, convert, bare_url, necessary, archiving, service, repairing, dead, particularly, vulnerable, record, depends, hosting, maintaining, guaranteed, unusable, hand, preserves, author, less, visually, pleasing, long, converting, maintains, consistent, refill, several, uses, threatened, receiving, massive, indicating, accurate, mark, were, hundreds, thousands, informational, consequence, continues, disclaimer, warns, readers, accordingly, experiencing, flux, fast, attracts, update, real, inaccuracies, draw, improved, soon, story, rapidly, progresses, initial, feel, latest, write, size, depend, breadth, four, composed, fails, follow, stand, own, concise, cultivates, teasing, hinting, follows, explain, summarize, points, prominent, controversies, layout, introduces, concisely, summarizes, nointro, absent, intro, clear, satisfactory, resident, whenever, true, identified, tagger, wishes, attract, viewpoints, unbalanced, perspectives, high, accompanied, actionable, within, conditions, met, disputed, dispute, rewrite, wording, covers, proportionately, far, possible, bias, start, left, surface, salvage, little, alternative, strip, out, reliably, ideal, course, explore, ground, cover, advertisements, limited, commercial, indeed, religious, spiritual, leaders, sports, teams, gaming, clans, though, always, financially, compensated, writings, rewritten, spam, criteria, fundamentally, exclusively, paid1, involvement, noble, causes, reads, buy, company, product, price, online, sellers, unencyclopedic, meaningless, filled, website, release, touting, virtues, neutrally, peacock, buzzwords, inappropriate, advertising, puff, think, focused, better, twenty, badge, mix, seeking, assess, demonstration, overkill, while, certain, caution, nothing, connected, mainstream, vanity, magazines, scholarly, journals, television, radio, documentaries, oversight, reputation, fact, checking, accuracy, websites, blogs, forum, posts, facebook, linkedin, twitter, open, wikis, self, mistakes, beyond, trivial, shown, redirected, merged, meet, significance, presumes, received, work, properly, employs, concept, avoid, subjects, worthy, world, unconnected, indiscriminate, inclusion, finding, large, google, local, archives, library, subscription, services, newspaperarchive, ancestry, prescription, involves, alongside, existing, especially, invalid, purpose, interpretive, claims, heavily, materials, accounts, people, opposed, extent, easy, misuse, straightforward, educated, specialized, presents, interpretation, evaluation, predominant, indirectly, precision, associate, portions, associates, becomes, very, difficult, check, items, includes, precise, unclear, list, rendered, involve, call, rely, blp, verification, response, replace, importance, aspects, embedded, raw, unverified, unref, wrapped, orphaning, line, intact, january, 2008, shows, parameters, show, right, instructions, detailed, themselves, helpful, initially, parts, clarity, served, variant, versions, conversely, highly, unambiguous, orphaned, suitable, renders, inapplicable, overarching, reasoning, behind, thank, publish, insert, turn, backspace, key, keyboard, visualeditor, month, year, somewhere, decision, now, exceptions, individual, plainly, unambiguously, required, proper, ongoing, activity, yet, raised, maintenancedisagreement, wntrmt, lastly, times, fundamental, lacking, discovers, flagging, critical, according, best, interpreted, worth, purely, chiefly, old, sufficient, argument, exception, discussions, encouraged, bullet, silent, fully, supported, strongly, recommend, initiate, failed, coi, concluded, elsewhere, implementing, practice, initiated, requesting, error, discussing, placer, active, upon, determining, perhaps, adequately, permanently, circumstances, wtrmt, shortcut, likewise, providing, basics, indicated, words, phrases, explored, resources, doing, results, called, sure, before, require, part, both, solve, lifeblood, compliance, manual, writing, know, every, works, making, bold, okay, remedied, truly, mechanics, saving, manually, removes, explains, process, examining, arrived, saying, legitimate, offer, exchange, money, scam, warning, ability, highlights, boldly, nutshell, details, processes, procedures, aspect, norms, practices, varying, vetting, bombing, responsible, wayback, machine, http, 20220617064539, wiki, timestamps, capture, fail, success, 2023, 2021, jul, jun,

Text of the page (random words):
nt of view and no original research but a host of other issues may be flagged including tone and style of writing structure and formatting lack of links to or from other articles compliance with wikipedia s manual of style and the lack of a lead section please make sure the issue has been resolved before removing the template that does require some effort on your part to understand both the problem and how to solve it an example if the issue flagged by the maintenance template is that the article contains no references a citation needed template used might be unreferenced typically placed by the code you would see when wikitext source editing unreferenced date june 2022 it is important to understand that what you see when reading an article and what you see when editing it are different thus the above code only seen when doing source editing results in the display of the called template below example this article does not cite any sources please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources unsourced material may be challenged and removed find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor june 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message this template contains a number of links indicated by the words and phrases in blue three of these links are to pages that when explored provide context and resources for you to understand why the template was placed on the page and how to address the issue of the article being unreferenced cite which links to the content guideline wikipedia citing sources sources which links to the policy wikipedia verifiability and adding citations to reliable sources which links to a help page providing a how to guide to the basics of citing references whatever maintenance tag brought you to this help page should likewise contain relevant explanatory links addressed to whatever its issue is read these explanatory and contextual pages to learn about the problem and what it is you need to do to take care of it again some of the more common maintenance templates seen are addressed in the specific template guidance section below when to remove shortcut wp wtrmt maintenance templates are not meant to be in articles permanently any user without a conflict of interest may remove a maintenance template in any of the following circumstances when the issue has been adequately addressed upon determining that the issue has been resolved perhaps by someone else if it reasonably appears that the template did not belong when placed or was added in error consider first discussing the matter with the original placer of the template unless this user is no longer active on wikipedia in any case if the issue appears contentious seek consensus on the talk page when an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated for templates requesting it when there is consensus on the talk page or elsewhere as to how to address the flagged issue and you are reasonably implementing those changes it is good practice to note the location of the consensus in the edit summary accompanying your removal ideally with a link to the location when it can reasonably be concluded that the template is no longer relevant such as a current template appearing in an article that no longer documents a current event if the maintenance template is of a type that requires support but is not fully supported for example neutrality related templates such as coi associated with the conflict of interest guideline or pov associated with the neutral point of view policy strongly recommend that the tagging editor initiate a discussion generally on the article s talk page to support the placement of the tag if the tagging editor failed to do so or the discussion is dormant and there is no other support for the template it can be removed you may remove a template when according to your best judgement the lack of edits and or talk page discussion should be interpreted as the issue not worth fixing as a form of silent consensus please note there is currently no consensus for general age related removal of maintenance templates that is removing a template purely or chiefly because it is old is not considered a sufficient argument exception removing pov related templates whose discussions have gone dormant is encouraged as addressed in the bullet point immediately above lastly there are times when a person attempting to address a maintenance template that flags some fundamental matter may find that the issue cannot actually be addressed for example if an article is flagged as lacking citations to reliable secondary sources written by third parties to the topic and a user seeing the maintenance templates discovers that such sources appear not to exist that usually means the article should be deleted in such cases it is not so much that the template does not belong and should be removed but rather that flagging the page for maintenance will never address the more critical issue that the page itself does not belong on wikipedia at all when not to remove shortcuts wp wntrmt wp maintenancedisagreement you should not remove maintenance templates if any of the following apply you do not understand the issues raised by the template the issue has not yet been resolved there is ongoing activity or discussion related to the template issue the problem that the maintenance template flags is plainly and unambiguously required for a proper article under wikipedia s policies and guidelines you have been paid to edit the article or have some other conflict of interest exceptions apply see individual template documentation removal have you carefully read the help pages and thoroughly fixed the problem or have you made a considered decision that the template is not or is no longer applicable great now to remove the maintenance template either click on edit or edit source at the top of the page or if the maintenance template is not at the top but somewhere in the body of the article you might instead use a section edit link if you are editing wikitext source editing delete the template code the template code you see in this edit mode will usually be in the following form as in the example above name of template date month year if you are editing using visualeditor click on the template tag which will then turn blue press the delete or backspace key on your keyboard leave a descriptive edit summary e g removed insert the name of template because i have fixed the issue click publish changes that s it thank you changing a template problems flagged by some templates may imply secondary problems that will still exist after you take care of the main issue in such cases it may be more appropriate to switch the template to another applicable one following your edits rather than just removing it the reasoning behind the change in templates should be addressed in the edit summary case in point is the unreferenced template example used above it is placed on pages with no references thus adding just one suitable reference renders that maintenance template inapplicable however that change does not take care of the overarching issue of poor sourcing in this example a change to a different template may be appropriate depending on the type quality depth and manner of sourcing added to fix the issue such as refimprove no footnotes primary sources or one of the many others listed at wikipedia template messages sources of articles conversely some templates flag highly discrete issues where there is no need to consider a switch to another template for example if an article is orphaned no other articles in the main article namespace link to it then once that is taken care of by the addition of links to it from other articles the issue is gone entirely and the tag s removal is unambiguous when a flagged issue has been addressed in parts of an article but remains in discrete sections clarity may be served by replacing the template with a section variant or by use of inline cleanup tags if such versions of the template exist in some cases it may be helpful to request review of a maintenance template s removal or proposed removal with the editor who initially added it to the article at issue specific template guidance this section provides guidance on how to address some of the more common specific templates that may have brought you to this help page more detailed information about the templates can be found by following the links to the templates themselves click show at the right to display the instructions multiple issues some articles will be flagged for multiple discrete problems using a single template multiple issues if you take care of one or more problems that it flags but not all do not remove the template entirely but just those parameters in it that you have fixed the example below shows three different issues flagged by this template multiple issues orphan date january 2008 pov date june 2009 one source date march 2011 if you address the orphaning issue but not the other two remove just the line that flagged the orphan issue and leave the others intact thus your removal would leave the template in this state multiple issues pov date june 2009 one source date march 2011 see the sections below for how to address some of the more common problems flagged by templates that may be wrapped into this template unreferenced all of wikipedia s core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing for example the content of wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable sources the notability of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature which are independent of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail not just mere mentions and in order to establish that the content is not original research the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources unreferenced typically placed by the code unreferenced date june 2022 having redirects such as unsourced unverified no references no sources and unref and displaying when reading as this article does not cite any sources please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources unsourced material may be challenged and removed find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor june 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article containing no references at all this template no longer applies once a single reference appears in the article whether placed through the preferred method of inline citations ones appearing in a general references section or even through such a poor method as including an embedded raw link to address the issue add citations to reliable sources because of their importance wikipedia contains numerous instruction pages on aspects of referencing we suggest starting with help referencing for beginners and help introduction to referencing 1 and then seeing wikipedia citing sources for a more involved treatment noting that each contains see also sections linking to additional help pages guides and tutorials a visual guide to placing inline citations through ref ref tags may also help and appears below visual inline citation guide formatting references using inline citations all information in wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources our preferred method of citation is using the cite php form of inline citations using the ref ref elements using this method each time a particular source is mined for information don t copy word for word a footnote is placed in the text inline that takes one to the detail of the source when clicked set forth in a references section after the text of the article in brief anywhere you want a footnote to appear in a piece of text you place an opening ref tag followed by the text of the citation which you want to appear at the bottom of the article and close with a ref tag note the closing slash for multiple use of a single reference the opening ref tag is given a name like so ref name name followed by the citation text and a closing ref tag each time you want to use that footnote again you simply use the first element with a slash like so ref name name in order for these references to appear you must tell the software where to display them using either the code references or most commonly the template reflist which can be modified to display the references in columns using reflist colwidth 30em per our style guidelines the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated references located after the body of the article inline citation code what you type in edit mode what it produces when you save two separate citations ref citation text ref ref citation text2 ref multiple ref name multiple citation text3 ref citation ref name multiple use ref name multiple references reflist two separate citations 1 2 multiple 3 citation 3 use 3 references _________________ citation text citation text2 a b c citation text3 templates that can be used between ref ref tags to format references citation cite web cite book cite news cite journal others examples as noted higher on this page unless you thoroughly source a page in response to this template it may more appropriate to switch this template with a more specific one rather than simply removing it depending on the type quality depth and manner of sourcing added to fix the issue you might replace it with refimprove no footnotes primary sources or a host of others listed at wikipedia template messages sources of articles refimprove all of wikipedia s core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing for example the content of wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable sources the notability of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature which are independent of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail not just mere mentions and in order to establish that the content is not original research the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources refimprove typically placed by the code refimprove date june 2022 having redirects such as improve references verify more sources and citations needed and displaying when reading as this article needs additional citations for verification please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources unsourced material may be challenged and removed find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor june 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that has some but insufficient inline citations to support the material currently in the article it should not be used for artic...