Meta tags:

Headings (most frequently used words):

edit, of, the, image, and, wikipedia, copyright, images, free, logo, in, file, navigation, tools, media, questions, contents, owned, by, subject, my, article, non, have, same, name, company, simple, design, rule, bots, composite, possibly, public, domain, 1007wrdu, png, rc, modeler, 197311, jpg, porvoo, communion, adding, for, people, anti, fascist, front, dominic, pezzola, database, authors, publishers, who, approved, quotes, on, inconsistent, logic, with, use, copyrighted, photos, pd, because, lawrence, photograph, collection, national, library, ireland, amnh, digital, repository, how, much, similarity, before, posting, at, wp, cpn, menu, personal, namespaces, views, search, contribute, print, export, other, projects, languages,

Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (397), and (121), reply (109), use (106), free (85), for (84), that (83), you (81), #copyright (76), non (75), this (60), file (60), 2022 (59), wikipedia (56), utc (55), talk (53), october (52), not (49), content (49), image (47), photo (43), #article (41), from (38), can (36), page (35), but (32), logo (32), used (30), was (27), are (27), with (27), edit (26), rationale (26), other (25), about (24), have (24), archive (24), there (23), because (23), how (22), would (21), more (20), all (19), being (19), then (19), they (19), one (19), commons (18), has (18), like (18), example (18), which (18), your (18), policy (17), license (17), here (17), marchjuly (17), closed (17), year (17), under (16), work (16), want (16), see (16), who (15), their (15), add (15), files (15), before (14), still (14), were (14), images (14), question (14), questions (14), may (13), information (13), should (13), any (13), could (13), per (13), need (13), pakistan (13), bot (13), articles (12), just (12), much (12), subject (12), such (12), uploaded (12), allowed (12), been (11), will (11), some (11), created (11), considered (11), ireland (11), even (11), each (11), since (11), might (11), public (11), domain (11), way (11), also (11), its (11), template (11), help (10), too (10), holder (10), own (10), jpg (10), people (10), upload (9), what (9), find (9), them (9), two (9), removed (9), please (9), original (9), permission (9), make (9), png (9), link (8), first (8), same (8), front (8), achill (8), thanks (8), when (8), doesn (8), criteria (8), these (8), whether (8), without (8), where (8), however (8), probably (8), sure (8), someone (8), else (8), only (8), media (8), using (7), pages (7), notice (7), don (7), states (7), means (7), needs (7), ten (7), out (7), boat (7), com (7), fair (7), law (7), given (7), provided (7), taken (7), government (7), person (7), logos (7), simple (7), anti (7), fascist (7), tag (7), archives (7), main (6), history (6), new (6), section (6), create (6), automatically (6), org (6), licensed (6), copyrighted (6), part (6), whpq (6), library (6), picture (6), possible (6), nthep (6), above (6), ways (6), photos (6), general (6), adding (6), nfc (6), claim (6), author (6), things (6), now (6), within (6), added (6), able (6), criterion (6), than (6), kraken (6), links (5), https (5), never (5), acceptable (5), freely (5), study (5), include (5), september (5), understand (5), protected (5), explained (5), consensus (5), particular (5), give (5), specific (5), relevant (5), place (5), long (5), photograph (5), published (5), seem (5), check (5), those (5), think (5), illustrate (5), consent (5), required (5), compliant (5), pretty (5), individual (5), really (5), after (5), licensing (5), does (5), flickr (5), certainly (5), best (5), though (5), quotes (5), court (5), click (5), muhafiz (5), communion (5), modeler (5), ask (5), bots (5), resolution (5), requests (5), wikimedia (4), last (4), version (4), related (4), contents (4), seems (4), very (4), thank (4), problem (4), source (4), sometimes (4), many (4), similarity (4), 2011 (4), yawl (4), boats (4), thoughtidretired (4), isn (4), hard (4), thing (4), most (4), stand (4), alone (4), harder (4), maybe (4), going (4), post (4), different (4), anyone (4), publication (4), ever (4), national (4), collection (4), photographer (4), reason (4), nothing (4), description (4), identification (4), years (4), said (4), others (4), trying (4), why (4), almost (4), united (4), either (4), again (4), provenance (4), khan (4), email (4), publishers (4), database (4), hello (4), currently (4), owned (4), try (4), eligible (4), listed (4), found (4), protection (4), release (4), porvoo (4), him (4), looks (4), rule (4), company (4), name (4), blairsmom (4), desk (4), note (4), discussion (4), view (3), privacy (3), terms (3), creative (3), item (3), changes (3), current (3), events (3), navigation (3), search (3), english (3), account (3), categories (3), editors (3), necessary (3), problems (3), while (3), issues (3), enough (3), corresponding (3), cpn (3), posting (3), saw (3), digital (3), amnh (3), island (3), 2010 (3), type (3), satisfy (3), meet (3), establish (3), justify (3), generally (3), uses (3), itself (3), perhaps (3), had (3), interest (3), clearly (3), freer (3), written (3), january (3), status (3), answer (3), lawrence (3), verify (3), basically (3), number (3), know (3), assume (3), works (3), case (3), lists (3), deceased (3), primary (3), purposes (3), top (3), good (3), based (3), inconsistent (3), provide (3), chief (3), further (3), moved (3), didn (3), once (3), 10c (3), described (3), preserveourhistory (3), multiple (3), separate (3), must (3), exactly (3), asem (3), credited (3), fine (3), quote (3), adam (3), hochschild (3), authors (3), requested (3), online (3), pezzola (3), reasons (3), deletion (3), fill (3), parameter (3), order (3), stop (3), removing (3), easiest (3), syntax (3), reference (3), replica (3), copyrights (3), user (3), look (3), looking (3), purpose (3), 197311 (3), border (3), below (3), guitar (3), pick (3), 1007wrdu (3), 1989 (3), something (3), screenshots (3), composite (3), design (3), lordloko (3), fogle (3), 2007 (3), 2006 (3), mcq (3), noticeboards (3), sanctions (3), statement (2), contact (2), text (2), additional (2), apply (2), registered (2), attribution (2), bahasa (2), download (2), special (2), tools (2), recent (2), portal (2), personal (2), forums (2), media_copyright_questions (2), into (2), versions (2), box (2), complicated (2), come (2), close (2), lots (2), copy (2), sentences (2), tagged (2), longer (2), threshold (2), time (2), encyclopedia (2), accessible (2), diagram (2), research (2), repository (2), meide (2), chuck (2), sikes (2), kathryn (2), vernacular (2), historical (2), context (2), 235 (2), 255 (2), 1111 (2), 1095 (2), 9270 (2), 00297 (2), doi (2), international (2), journal (2), nautical (2), archaeology (2), exists (2), fact (2), locally (2), set (2), linked (2), likely (2), wanted (2), becomes (2), easier (2), well (2), rest (2), assuming (2), sourced (2), favor (2), decorative (2), mind (2), editing (2), maritime (2), another (2), similar (2), nature (2), etc (2), end (2), century (2), life (2), big (2), died (2), determine (2), important (2), ones (2), correct (2), appear (2), age (2), world (2), mean (2), quite (2), regardless (2), sort (2), holding (2), eisenhower (2), often (2), outside (2), did (2), cases (2), accordance (2), having (2), applies (2), included (2), types (2), unless (2), doing (2), exception (2), increasing (2), established (2), met (2), treated (2), commander (2), take (2), done (2), gul (2), hassan (2), nflists (2), embedded (2), army (2), down (2), solely (2), held (2), conflict (2), write (2), dead (2), bodies (2), require (2), december (2), tikka (2), logic (2), may1787 (2), excerpt (2), fairly (2), short (2), paragraph (2), properly (2), book (2), adamhochschild (2), earthlink (2), dot (2), net (2), date (2), address (2), publisher (2), approved (2), wouldn (2), several (2), video (2), enforcement (2), get (2), believe (2), posted (2), better (2), necessarily (2), his (2), window (2), federal (2), dominic (2), unable (2), lacking (2), speedy (2), paff (2), explaining (2), militant (2), groups (2), deleted (2), couple (2), parameters (2), say (2), differences (2), aren (2), released (2), restrictions (2), holders (2), yourself (2), standpoint (2), elements (2), addition (2), implementation (2), group (2), left (2), noticeboard (2), mainly (2), templates (2), justified (2), resolve (2), issue (2), missing (2), actually (2), king (2), arrogance2001 (2), remove (2), explain (2), 1973 (2), uui (2), show (2), living (2), relatively (2), station (2), letters (2), element (2), back (2), 1978 (2), 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧 (2), 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙚 (2), 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 (2), cgi (2), specifically (2), thinking (2), possibly (2), game (2), master (2), reducing (2), point (2), high (2), uploading (2), yaoumfa (2), 2017 (2), regiment (2), roller (2), coaster (2), wiki (2), pic (2), jim (2), trocchio (2), gave (2), abe (2), generator (2), tocchio (2), vrt (2), august (2), 2009 (2), open (2), 2021 (2), purge (2), start (2), cannot (2), village (2), pump (2), respond (2), request (2), hit (2), existing (2), appropriate (2), internet (2), proposals (2), centralized (2), jump (2), skip (2), web (2), sep (2), cookie, statistics, developers, mobile, disclaimers, available, site, agree, trademark, profit, organization, foundation, inc, sharealike, edited, tiếng, việt, українська, türkçe, తెలుగు, suomi, српски, srpski, සිංහල, саха, тыла, русский, română, oʻzbekcha, ўзбекча, нохчийн, မြန်မာဘာသာ, melayu, मराठी, മലയാളം, македонски, עברית, indonesia, hrvatski, français, deutsch, čeština, বাংলা, العربية, languages, projects, printable, pdf, print, export, wikidata, permanent, community, learn, contribute, donate, random, read, views, project, namespaces, log, contributions, logged, menu, hidden, checked, incorrect, signed, retrieved, index, php, title, oldid, 1115767458, material, copied, follow, instructions, violations, investigate, noticing, starrygrandma, suspected, infringement, regularly, across, large, amounts, paraphrasing, mirroring, single, paste, paragraphs, newly, filed, lasting, usually, sigh, ignore, mess, move, according, earwig, copyvio, detector, repeated, verbatim, approximate, percentage, actionable, blanked, referred, care, rewrite, animalparty, georgia, david, crenshaw, barrow, npp, indication, referenced, american, natural, museum, unsure, okay, yupwewin, digitallibrary, handle, 2246, 1583, cretodromia, references, correctly, sample, cropped, bypassing, irritating, libraries, museums, imply, mentions, automatic, purposely, restrictive, concept, creating, clarify, rough, assessment, suppose, frequent, complain, regarding, notable, equivalent, otherwise, critical, commentary, reasonably, understood, reader, seeing, neversue, nobodycomplained, pcp, usage, interests, particularly, traditional, small, craft, story, coincides, closely, ideologically, opposed, numbers, existed, construction, 19th, yawls, integral, entry, proportionate, hope, answers, deal, kent, maritime_history, ulster, currach, congested, districts, board, highland, potato, famine, hasn, shown, abide, basic, pma, photographic, 1952, depends, line, requirements, variables, moment, definite, photographs, due, french, robert, 1841, 1917, matter, dates, latest, war, substantially, unploaded, expired, wire, various, licenses, supposed, 1954, assumed, saying, opinion, b41745stf, caption, renewed, usgov, princess, seble, desta, flowers, emperor, haile, selassie, prince, sahle, president, dwight, lady, mamie, jpeg, official, expirations, worldwide, declaring, gotten, canada, australia, far, argument, snapshot, privately, soldier, ridiculously, 20th, subjects, carl, lindberg, tell, sound, sounds, mixing, together, true, takes, accept, certain, allows, originally, pointed, assess, entries, tables, typically, infobox, meets, already, applied, ago, failed, providing, changed, indeed, pakistani, servers, located, discussed, turns, both, hand, protect, needed, themselves, over, provides, real, neither, nor, continue, treat, claiming, meeting, previous, ffd, justone, guidelines, nftables, commanders, 1947, 1972, gen, except, tuned, understanding, significant, times, tikkakhan, nfur, bengali, intellectuals, 1971, apart, happened, atrocities, data, sought, granted, excessive, inappropriate, organised, graeme, bartlett, wikiquote, wrote, approve, lawyer, experience, opposite, resides, creator, layers, cellphone, private, color, transfer, justice, surveillance, camera, overhead, angle, lean, yes, theory, anthology, printout, filing, gray, area, stuff, interesting, puzzle, tho, pics, lumonredacts, taking, day, social, websites, eventually, enfrocement, evidence, google, tineye, reverse, amateur, her, orange, mike, black, white, police, shield, break, capitol, credit, says, paperwork, safe, conclude, cullen328, newspaper, satisfies, few, easist, documentation, explains, finally, little, structures, artwork, seperate, speedily, intended, avoid, near, website, permitted, thus, old, assessed, local, moving, someowhere, defined, comes, count, helpful, scratch, entirely, incoprorates, tricker, representation, exact, duplication, consideration, minor, intent, encyclopedic, always, whenever, replicas, instead, tracing, derivative, otherimage, nfcce, fop, freedom, panorama, mardan, city, trackingterrorism, peoples, jammu, kashmir, tasked, respect, lookk, namespace, userpages, drafts, provoo, withour, simply, desired, expected, failing, manner, quasi, icons, tend, infoboxes, organizations, companies, teams, represent, tends, incapable, assessing, complies, doubt, nfcc, mos, summary, wondering, haven, church, heraldry, helpfull, scan, november, reliably, cover, art, seagull, identify, poor, magazine, clearer, colour, includes, unreliably, corporation, rights, reserved, reproductions, whole, prohibited, uncer, unsourced, blp, ideas, mark, smith, modeling, pioneer, falls, originality, represented, shape, shading, complexity, examples, opinions, convert, former, radio, fails, bascially, call, slogan, plus, push, cite_note, nfg, wrdu, prior, march, mistakenly, subsequently, made, later, five, shows, visible, janaury, subsequent, registration, unclear, checking, action, children, television, gets, none, 1987, anything, vpc, hits, cocatalog, loc, gov, bin, pwebrecon, someplace, attempt, minimizing, reduce, fundamental, mechanics, low, resolutions, unfortunately, keep, barely, legible, keeps, balanced, 512p, anyway, glades12, trouble, around, 240, 360p, remember, regrettably, device, axiom, verge, parallel, worlds, fwiw, belgium, netherlands, higher, standard, sweat, brow, iterates, unique, character, zipper, belgian, broektoe, renamed, man, cheers, kraken_logo, uselang, careful, marked, default, assumption, legally, guess, usable, wants, directing, band, complete, willing, everyone, anytime, reuse, including, money, off, advise, kept, suggest, until, late, enforcing, revocation, gråbergs, gråa, sång, pictures, got, directly, sections, older, archived, lowercase, sigmabot, iii, days, serves, yearly, inside, month, format, sidebox, 2005, examinations, pre, merged, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2008, list, word, belong, leave, poster, arising, answered, directed, wrong, replying, updates, notified, typing, sign, publish, complaining, untagged, forgetting, choose, documented, requesting, downloaded, exceptions, vast, majority, heading, creators, tags, whose, starts, welcome, tagging, ichd, imagehelp, shortcuts, category, wikiproject, miscellaneous, wmf, idea, lab, technical, comment, teahouse, false, positives, filters, arbitration, committee, vandalism, usernames, sockpuppets, discretionary, warring, 3rr, contributor, conduct, undeletion, miscellany, redirects, xfd, importation, moves, splits, mergers, merges, handling, translation, titleblacklist, scalable, vector, graphics, whitelist, blacklist, spam, resource, reliable, sources, neutral, fringe, theories, external, dispute, biographies, persons, permissions, oversight, proxies, errors, interface, admins, education, closure, bureaucrats, administrators, incidents, listing, ongoing, discussions, function, formal, review, processes, dashboard, venues, bottom, toc, wayback, machine, http, 20221013195936, timestamps, capture, fail, success, 2023, nov, oct, 2026, 232, captures,

Text of the page (random words):
rticles is not allowed per non free content use criterion 8 wp nflists and mos logo non free logos do tend to be allowed when they are being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infoboxes of stand alone articles about the organizations companies teams etc they represent but using them in other articles or in other ways tends to be much harder to justify per relevant wikipedia policy the bot that removed the files for reference is incapable of assessing whether a use complies with wp nfcc 8 but once again i doubt a consensus could be established in favor of such use marchjuly talk 00 26 5 october 2022 utc reply reply adding logo for people s anti fascist front edit i m added the logo of the people s anti fascist front on wikipedia and i added it as the logo of the group someone said it was not allowed to be used and it was removed then how do i add it when it is not allowed it is from https trackingterrorism org group peoples anti fascist front paff jammu and kashmir muhafiz e pakistan talk 14 01 5 october 2022 utc reply reply hi muhafiz e pakistan file people s anti fascist front jpg was removed from people s anti fascist front by a wp bot because the bot for non free content use criterion 10c reasons because the bot was unable to find a non free use rationale for that specific use on the file s page the file is still lacking a non free use rationale for any wikipedia article which means it is eligible for speedy deletion per wp f6 it also is currently not being used in any articles which means it s eligible for speedy deletion per wp f5 if you think that file s non free use in the paff article satisfies all ten of the criteria listed here then you should add a non free use rationale to the file s page explaining why there are few ways this can be done but the easist is perhaps to use template non free use rationale logo to the file s page the template s documentation explains how to use it and fill in its parameter finally you probably should provide a little more information about file mardan city jpg which is another file you uploaded assuming that you did take this photo and since there seems to be freedom of panorama for such structures or artwork in pakistan per c com fop pakistan you should provided as much information about the photo as part of the file s description you can use template information to do this if you want marchjuly talk 01 11 7 october 2022 utc reply reply marchjuly but how do most people use logos of militant groups without non free use rationale muhafiz e pakistan talk 15 24 11 october 2022 utc reply reply all non free content is required to have two things as explained in wp nfc implementation 1 a file copyright license and 2 a seperate and specific non free use rationale for each use non free files lacking either of those things may be tagged for speedily deletion per wp f4 or wp f6 or removed from the article where they re being used per wp nfcce you uploaded file people s anti fascist front jpg as non free content but didn t provide a non free use rationale for the way you intended to use the file in order to stop the bot from removing the file and to avoid the file being deleted per wp f6 you will need to add the required rationale to the file s page you can do this a couple of ways but the easiest way is probably to use template non free use rationale logo go to the file s page and click edit then add the template s syntax near the top of the editing window above the copyright license template s syntax fill in all of the relevant parameters as best as you can the logo had to come some where so you should add a link to the website where you found the logo to the source parameter after you do this re add the file to the article listed in article parameter of the rationale if you do this the bot should stop removing the files as for your question but how do most people use logos of militant groups without non free use rationale the only thing i can say is such non free use isn t compliant with wikipedia s non free content use policy and not permitted it s also quite possible that there are differences in how the files are licensed and how they re being used as explained in wp otherimage not all logo files you see used on wikipedia are licensed as non free content and thus their uses aren t subject to non free content use policy if the logo has been released under an acceptable free license by its copyright holder or is considered to be within the public domain for some reason for example it s too simple to ever be eligible for copyright protection or it s now too old to be still eligible for copyright protection then it s not subject to the same restrictions as non free content use freely licensed content and public domain content still do however need information about their provenance provided on their file pages so that their copyright licensing can be assessed but they are not required to have a non free use rationale as for the other files you ve uploaded as your own work those files should really be moved to wikipedia commons since they aren t non free content and there s no need for them to be local files i e for use on english wikipedia only so moving them to commons will make them much easier for others to use before they can be moved however more information about the provenance of each file needs to be added to its page once again the easiest way to do this is probably to use template like template information just add the template s syntax to each file s page and then fill in the parameters it s important though to make sure that all the files you ve uploaded are you own work and not things created by others that you might ve found someowhere online only copyright holders can release their content as own work under a free license and content found online is not automatically free from copyright protection as explained here for reference own work is defined in a special way when it comes to copyright as explained here and you can only claim original content that you yourself create as your own work marchjuly talk 01 03 12 october 2022 utc reply reply marchjuly thanks and i have one more question can i just create my own replica of the file and would that count as copyright and also be my own work muhafiz e pakistan talk 13 01 12 october 2022 utc reply reply muhafiz e pakistan from a copyright standpoint perhaps you ll find wp derivative and c com dw helpful if you create an original logo from scratch then you d probably be ok since you d be the copyright holder of the logo and could release it under a free license if you want if the logo you create however is based on entirely on someone else s copyrighted logo or incoprorates other copyright protected elements then things get tricker because there may be other copyrights that need to be considered in addition to the copyright on your representation even if your replica is not an exact duplication e g a tracing of the original logo consideration may still need to be given to the copyright of the original logo its based on if the differences are minor and the intent is to make others clearly think your version is a replica of the original logo from an encyclopedic standpoint it s almost always better to use the original versions of logos whenever possible than trying to use user created replicas instead marchjuly talk 02 38 13 october 2022 utc reply reply dominic pezzola edit this newspaper article has a black and white photo of pezzola using a police shield to break a window at the us capitol on january 6 2022 the photo credit says court paperwork since the court in question is a us federal court is it safe to conclude that this photo is in the public domain cullen328 talk 23 00 6 october 2022 utc reply reply not necessarily the photo may have been provided to the court by an amateur photographer who didn t necessarily want to be credited for her or his work orange mike talk 00 19 7 october 2022 utc reply reply it also seems that lots of people were taking photos on that day and then posting them on social media or other websites i believe some of these were eventually used by law enfrocement as evidence in court cases maybe try a google reverse image search or tineye to see whether it might have been posted online before and given better attribution marchjuly talk 00 46 7 october 2022 utc reply reply not a lawyer but from my experience i wouldn t assume pd the opposite really copyright resides with the creator of the work several layers here this is a still from a cellphone video owned by a private individual so they own the original work which is also probably in color the government law enforcement probably never requested a transfer of copyright or even a use license since it doesn t require that for its justice purposes if this were a still from a surveillance camera owned by the government like from an overhead angle then i would lean yes pd you could also in theory create an anthology of images or a picture of a printout of the filing but this is all gray area stuff interesting puzzle tho hard to get the best pics of these events lumonredacts 04 54 8 october 2022 utc reply reply database of authors and publishers who approved quotes on wikipedia edit hello is there currently a database of authors and publishers who approve quotes on wikipedia if not can it be created author permission to use content on wikipedia adamhochschild at earthlink dot net wrote if the excerpt is a fairly short one not more than a paragraph or two and is properly credited to my book it s fine with me if you quote it on wikipedia all the best adam hochschild may1787 talk 05 42 7 october 2022 utc reply reply the answer to your question would be no editors include quotes if they want to author permission is not sought or granted and the quote will be used under fair use sometimes use is excessive inappropriate and not fair there will not be a database of these quotes wikiquote is a more more organised collection graeme bartlett talk 05 48 7 october 2022 utc reply reply author and publishers permission to use copyrighted data author or publisher email address email content permission date adam hochschild adamhochschild at earthlink dot net if the excerpt is a fairly short one not more than a paragraph or two and is properly credited to my book it s fine with me if you quote it on wikipedia all the best adam hochschild october 7 2022 example example example example example example example example example example example example may1787 talk 02 24 8 october 2022 utc reply reply inconsistent logic with use of copyrighted photos edit if i were to use this image in any other article apart from tikka khan it d be taken down because the image is described as used solely to illustrate a person since the copyright is held by the person who created the image that example is exactly what happened to me but then i see this image used in this article in the atrocities section even though its non free use just like the tikka khan one why is this one being used in multiple articles so freely preserveourhistory talk 11 27 8 october 2022 utc reply reply preserveourhistory the image file dead bodies of bengali intellectuals 14 december 1971 jpg is used in multiple articles because the people who wanted to use it have written a separate wp nfur case for each use the same applies to any other non free file you must write a separate rationale for each use so if you want to use file general tikkakhan jpg in any other article you need to write a policy compliant rationale and add that to the file page nthep talk 11 53 8 october 2022 utc reply reply except however the rationale is exactly the same on each use which is not really acceptable the rationale needs to be tuned to each use and without understanding any further significant of the image just a number of dead bodies doesn t seem to require the need to be used multiple times m asem t 12 48 8 october 2022 utc reply reply edit conflict hi preserveourhistory did someone tell you it d be taken down because the image is described as used solely to illustrate a person since the copyright is held by the person who created the image because that doesn t sound correct at all in fact it sounds like a mixing together of two different things while it s true that the person who takes a photo not the subject of a photo is generally considered the copyright holder of said photo there s nothing in wikipedia a image use policy that states such a photo can only be used in a wikipedia article about the photographer if that s what you mean if you want to upload a photo taken by someone else that is still considered to be protected by copyright then wikipedia is going to need some way to verify that the copyright holder has given their wp consent for the photo to be uploaded without the copyright holder s consent wikipedia can t accept the photo under a free license now in certain cases wikipedia allows copyrighted content like photos logos and other media to uploaded without the copyright holder s consent as long the way the content is being used is in accordance with wikipedia s non free content use policy the problem you were having with file lt gen gul hassan khan jpg was that it was originally uploaded as non free content and you were trying to use it in commander in chief of the pakistan army commanders in chief pakistan army 1947 1972 without adding a corresponding non free use rationale for that particular use to the file s page as required by non free content use criterion 10c that is why the bot removed the file and same thing applies to all non free content regardless of how it s used as nthep pointed out above now what the bot doesn t and can t assess is whether the non free use would be policy compliant if the file in question is provided with a non free use rationale in this case the answer is it would not because non free content is pretty much never allowed to illustrate individual entries in tables or lists embedded lists included per wp nftables and wp nflists a non free photo a deceased individual like gul hassan khan is typically allowed for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand alone article about the individual as long as it meets wp freer but is almost never allowed to be used in other types of article or other types of ways unless there s a really good policy based reason for doing so the first use in the article about the person is already considered an exception to wp copy guidelines for images and other media files which means each additional non free use after that becomes increasing more of an exception and increasing harder to justify there s nothing inconsistent with this because this has how relevant policy has been applied since the non free content policy was established so many years ago the bot removed the file because you failed to provide a non free use rationale for the use on the file s page but providing a rationale i...