Meta tags:

Headings (most frequently used words):

edit, ownership, of, navigation, editor, tools, wikipedia, content, contents, types, and, stewardship, user, pages, resolving, issues, examples, behaviour, see, also, external, links, menu, single, multiple, featured, articles, actions, statements, personal, namespaces, views, search, contribute, print, export, in, other, projects, languages,

Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (130), and (55), #article (51), #ownership (41), wikipedia (40), edit (34), page (31), editor (29), not (28), editors (28), with (24), you (23), may (22), talk (22), are (22), this (20), they (20), pages (16), that (16), other (15), for (14), can (14), policy (13), any (13), have (13), user (12), policies (11), from (11), content (11), changes (10), personal (10), good (10), see (10), editing (9), sources (9), also (9), will (9), such (9), featured (9), about (8), all (8), dispute (8), resolution (8), their (8), behavior (8), articles (8), project (7), guidelines (7), them (7), does (7), others (7), own (7), contributors (7), links (6), assume (6), faith (6), attacks (6), change (6), make (6), without (6), subject (6), edits (6), often (6), take (6), topic (6), your (6), should (6), stewardship (6), more (5), deletion (5), consensus (5), primary (5), reliable (5), discussion (5), some (5), right (5), statements (5), owner (5), while (5), particular (5), before (5), even (5), important (5), users (5), who (5), but (5), view (4), text (4), organization (4), use (4), edited (4), version (4), related (4), what (4), here (4), navigation (4), categories (4), list (4), copyright (4), shortcuts (4), style (4), summary (4), please (4), interest (4), ignore (4), vandalism (4), civility (4), work (4), first (4), part (4), when (4), reverts (4), comments (4), claiming (4), ideas (4), two (4), has (4), issues (4), behaviour (4), process (4), discuss (4), matter (4), multiple (4), one (4), privacy (3), terms (3), wikimedia (3), english (3), link (3), community (3), contents (3), create (3), contributions (3), conduct (3), org (3), space (3), attack (3), threats (3), point (3), conflict (3), warring (3), external (3), original (3), expert (3), review (3), many (3), relevant (3), reviews (3), after (3), actions (3), examples (3), address (3), try (3), usually (3), removing (3), quality (3), though (3), encyclopedia (3), anyone (3), group (3), find (3), problem (3), redirects (3), communicate (3), attempt (3), yourself (3), etc (3), single (3), types (3), those (3), contact (2), additional (2), non (2), commons (2), was (2), 2022 (2), simple (2), bahasa (2), information (2), upload (2), file (2), tools (2), main (2), search (2), history (2), https (2), title (2), ownership_of_content (2), namespace (2), template (2), categorization (2), lists (2), section (2), layout (2), images (2), bold (2), protection (2), criteria (2), biographies (2), etiquette (2), disruptive (2), sockpuppetry (2), rules (2), harassment (2), include (2), image (2), violations (2), verifiability (2), wiki (2), undo (2), there (2), need (2), because (2), following (2), indicate (2), motivation (2), form (2), including (2), necessary (2), just (2), previous (2), discussions (2), specific (2), grammar (2), prose (2), problems (2), introduced (2), reason (2), being (2), asked (2), detrimental (2), between (2), justified (2), over (2), certain (2), concerning (2), might (2), routine (2), then (2), resolve (2), always (2), civil (2), respect (2), think (2), neutrality (2), resolving (2), than (2), significant (2), free (2), must (2), its (2), these (2), like (2), where (2), care (2), civilly (2), why (2), constitute (2), persists (2), reversion (2), accusations (2), familiar (2), guideline (2), revert (2), bring (2), cases (2), core (2), associated (2), each (2), continues (2), made (2), solve (2), proceeding (2), mediation (2), allow (2), conflicts (2), approached (2), involve (2), reflect (2), common (2), involving (2), provided (2), fellow (2), written (2), against (2), off (2), cannot (2), material (2), defend (2), perhaps (2), oop (2), oops (2), jump (2), web (2), sep (2), cookie, statement, statistics, developers, mobile, disclaimers, available, under, apply, using, site, agree, registered, trademark, profit, foundation, inc, creative, attribution, sharealike, license, last, september, utc, tiếng, việt, اردو, türkçe, ไทย, తెలుగు, татарча, tatarça, svenska, suomi, srpskohrvatski, српскохрватски, српски, srpski, کوردی, සිංහල, русский, português, polski, 日本語, melayu, مصرى, मराठी, മലയാളം, македонски, magyar, lietuvių, қазақша, עברית, íslenska, indonesia, hrvatski, հայերեն, 한국어, galego, français, فارسی, español, ελληνικά, deutsch, čeština, brezhoneg, български, башҡортса, বাংলা, تۆرکجه, azərbaycanca, অসমীয়া, العربية, alemannisch, languages, wikibooks, projects, printable, download, pdf, print, export, wikidata, item, permanent, special, recent, portal, learn, help, contribute, donate, random, current, events, read, views, namespaces, log, account, logged, menu, hidden, move, protected, short, description, culture, retrieved, index, php, oldid, 1109674931, summaries, values, principles, licensing, friendly, wmf, subpages, boxes, wikiprojects, templates, classification, linking, lead, dates, numbers, accessibility, manual, understandability, broad, concept, hatnotes, disambiguation, size, blocking, banning, administrators, enforcement, revision, oversight, speedy, proposed, signatures, responding, harm, courtesy, vanishing, bite, newcomers, gaming, system, disrupt, illustrate, paid, contribution, disclosure, child, legal, patent, nonsense, fringe, theories, don, hoaxes, plagiarism, copies, lengthy, medicine, citing, autobiography, notability, titles, living, persons, neutral, research, five, pillars, key, authorship, communitywiki, authorshipmodel, levels, vandalizing, hard, hadn, previously, peanut, gallery, nothing, wrong, anything, misapplying, aintbroke, clear, wikiproject, our, approval, suggestions, put, created, wrote, majority, implying, kind, status, exists, qualified, only, pulling, rank, although, seen, isolation, context, pattern, indicates, occur, along, dogged, insistence, relentless, pushing, back, expression, purpose, discouraging, making, forms, purely, negative, consisting, insults, avoiding, altogether, extreme, patronize, interesting, lack, deep, understanding, below, providing, refers, repeating, reversions, rationale, strong, indicator, simply, finds, unnecessary, effect, assigning, priority, equivalent, versions, different, repeatedly, extended, period, protect, stable, disputes, minor, wording, frequently, claim, whether, openly, implicitly, added, maintenance, consistency, preservation, established, citation, styles, spelling, further, ownbehaviour, ownbehavior, consistently, demonstrates, similar, shown, probably, easy, identify, far, difficult, satisfaction, involved, helpful, remember, remain, accusing, owning, appear, aggressive, could, perceived, manner, same, amount, would, expect, accused, realize, protecting, respond, hostility, promote, failing, recognize, importance, stay, calm, bots, commonly, rights, well, concerns, rarely, housekeeping, handling, tags, disambiguating, been, moved, meant, replace, obvious, blp, offers, wide, latitude, manage, fit, nevertheless, homepages, still, serve, purposes, communication, collaboration, among, easier, functions, hampered, owned, identified, bronze, star, upper, corner, open, gone, through, checked, high, thorough, survey, literature, compliance, considerate, explaining, support, necessarily, contain, candidacy, subsequent, candidates, faown, shortcut, disagreement, proposing, way, specifics, discussed, likewise, expected, keeping, which, stands, official, dependable, method, brd, cycle, improvement, worked, build, present, state, order, believe, preserve, supported, referring, unless, best, regard, shepherding, result, sincere, cause, otherwise, very, knowledgeable, able, provide, credible, insights, locating, question, less, responsible, adhering, viewpoint, exhibits, meta, stewards, shepherd, oas, involvement, defending, highly, complex, simplest, scenario, consists, dominant, defended, reinforcing, former, frustrating, both, new, seasoned, fails, proceed, escalating, hostile, makes, wages, discussing, response, query, least, record, having, attempted, directly, wise, withdraw, conversation, return, ready, wars, engaged, keep, mind, experts, field, genuine, maintaining, preserving, accuracy, appears, descriptive, header, informing, readers, avoid, speculations, issue, require, type, welcome, exchange, understood, creator, conflicting, interests, promoting, opposing, hijacking, direction, emphasis, changing, unsuccessful, blanking, deleting, revenge, input, ignored, immediately, disregarded, sole, possession, watchlisted, amend, marginalise, valid, opinions, adequately, too, equal, offer, assistance, unfamiliar, never, therefore, cautious, rewriting, large, amounts, particularly, effective, acting, time, taking, out, equation, cool, things, considerably, fresh, look, week, later, someone, else, appeal, consider, war, similarly, submitting, standards, challenge, develop, submitted, used, redistributed, once, posted, stop, clearly, states, feel, possessive, contributed, few, quite, reasonable, hobby, however, watchfulness, starts, become, possessiveness, overdoing, believing, sort, people, mistake, collaboratively, individual, called, known, wikipedians, act, person, say, nor, dictate, volunteer, username, clean, start, block, evasion, owns, prevent, doing, addition, disagreements, starting, calmly, resolved, nutshell, describes, widely, accepted, standard, follow, normally, documents, control, copyrights, humourous, essay, usage, oneself, removal, posts, owntalk, wayback, machine, http, archive, 20221012150246, timestamps, capture, fail, success, 2023, 2021, nov, oct, jul, 2015, 2026, 500, captures,

Text of the page (random words):
ans no one no matter what has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article or any part of it even a subject of an article be that a person or organization does not own the article nor has any right to dictate what the article may or may not say some contributors feel possessive about material they have contributed to wikipedia a few editors will even defend such material against others it is quite reasonable to take an interest in an article on a topic you care about perhaps you are an expert or perhaps it is just your hobby however if this watchfulness starts to become possessiveness then you are overdoing it believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a common mistake people make on wikipedia once you have posted it to wikipedia you cannot stop anyone from editing text you have written as each edit page clearly states work submitted to wikipedia can be edited used and redistributed by anyone similarly by submitting your ideas for article organization categorization style standards etc to wikipedia you allow others to challenge and develop them if you find yourself in an edit war with other contributors why not take some time off from the editing process taking yourself out of the equation can cool things off considerably take a fresh look a week or two later or if someone else is claiming ownership of a page you can bring it up on the associated talk page appeal to other contributors or consider the dispute resolution process even though editors can never own an article it is important to respect the work and ideas of your fellow contributors therefore be cautious when removing or rewriting large amounts of content particularly if this content was written by one editor it is more effective to try to work with the editor than against them even if you think they are acting as if they own the article see also wikipedia civility wikipedia etiquette and wikipedia assume good faith provided that contributions and input from fellow editors are not ignored or immediately disregarded being the primary or sole editor of an article does not constitute ownership editors familiar with the topic and in possession of relevant reliable sources may have watchlisted such articles and may discuss or amend others edits provided this does not marginalise the valid opinions of others and is adequately justified it too does not equal ownership often these editors can be approached and may offer assistance to those unfamiliar with the article contents 1 types of ownership 1 1 single editor ownership 1 2 multiple editor ownership 2 ownership and stewardship 2 1 featured articles 3 user pages 4 resolving ownership issues 5 examples of ownership behaviour 5 1 actions 5 2 statements 6 see also 7 external links types of ownership edit there are two common types of ownership conflicts between users those involving one editor and those involving multiple editors while ownership behavior is often understood to involve the original creator of the article it can also involve other editors who have conflicting interests in promoting or opposing the subject hijacking the original article s direction and emphasis changing the title to reflect such changes or if unsuccessful blanking or deleting the article as a form of revenge single editor ownership edit in many cases but not all single editors engaged in ownership conflicts are also primary contributors to the article so keep in mind that such editors may be experts in their field or have a genuine interest in maintaining the quality of the article and preserving accuracy an editor who appears to assume ownership of an article should be approached on the article s talk page with a descriptive header informing readers about the topic always avoid accusations attacks and speculations concerning the motivation of any editor if the behaviour continues the issue may require dispute resolution but it is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation etc editors of this type often welcome discussion so a simple exchange of ideas will usually solve the problem of ownership if you find that the editor continues to be hostile makes personal attacks or wages edit wars try to ignore disruptive editing by discussing the topic on the talk page you may need to ignore attacks made in response to a query if ownership persists after a discussion dispute resolution may be necessary but at least you will be on record as having attempted to solve the problem directly with the editor it is important to make a good attempt to communicate with the editor on the article talk page before proceeding to mediation etc it may also be wise to allow them to withdraw from the conversation and return when they are ready multiple editor ownership edit the involvement of multiple editors each defending the ownership of the other can be highly complex the simplest scenario usually consists of a dominant editor who is defended by other editors reinforcing the former s ownership this can be frustrating to both new and seasoned editors as before address the topic and not the actions of the editors if this fails proceed to dispute resolution but it is important to communicate on the talk page and attempt to resolve the dispute yourself before escalating the conflict resolution process ownership and stewardship edit shortcuts wp oas wp stewardship wp shepherd wp stewardship redirects here for the group of users see meta stewards unless an editor exhibits behaviour associated with ownership it s best to assume good faith on their part and regard their behavior as stewardship stewardship or shepherding of an article or group of related articles may be the result of a sincere personal interest in the subject matter or in a cause or organization related to it the editor might also be an expert or otherwise very knowledgeable in the subject matter and able to provide credible insights for locating reliable sources the editors in question are no less responsible for adhering to core policies like neutrality of viewpoint verifiability with reliable sources and civility wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit but not all edits bring improvement in many cases a core group of editors will have worked to build the article up to its present state and will revert edits that they find detrimental in order they believe to preserve the quality of the encyclopedia such reversion does not indicate an ownership problem if it is supported by an edit summary referring to wikipedia policies and guidelines previous reviews and discussions or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit where disagreement persists after such a reversion the editor proposing the change should first take the matter to the talk page without personal comments or accusations of ownership in this way the specifics of any change can be discussed with the editors who are familiar with the article who are likewise expected to discuss the content civilly this is in keeping with the brd cycle which stands for bold revert discuss though not an official policy or guideline it is a dependable method for dispute resolution featured articles edit shortcut wp faown while featured articles identified by a bronze star in the upper right corner are open for editing like any other they have gone through a community review process as featured article candidates where they are checked for high quality sources a thorough survey of the relevant literature and compliance with the featured article criteria editors are asked to take particular care when editing a featured article it is considerate to discuss significant changes of text or images on the talk page first explaining civilly why sources and policies support a particular version of a featured article does not necessarily constitute ownership the article history template on the talk page will contain a link to the featured article candidacy and any subsequent featured article reviews user pages edit main pages wikipedia user pages and wikipedia talk page guidelines user talk pages wikipedia offers wide latitude to users to manage their user space as they see fit nevertheless they are not personal homepages and are not owned by the user they are still part of wikipedia and must serve its primary purposes in particular user talk pages make communication and collaboration among editors easier these functions must not be hampered by ownership behavior while other users and bots will more commonly edit your user talk page they have rights to edit other pages in your user space as well usually others will not edit your primary user page other than to address significant concerns rarely or to do routine housekeeping such as handling project related tags disambiguating links to pages that have been moved removing the page from categories meant for articles replace non free content by link to it or removing obvious vandalism or blp violations resolving ownership issues edit while it may be easy to identify ownership issues it is far more difficult to resolve the conflict to the satisfaction of the editors involved it is always helpful to remember to stay calm assume good faith and remain civil accusing other editors of owning the article may appear aggressive and could be perceived as a personal attack address the editor in a civil manner with the same amount of respect you would expect often editors accused of ownership may not even realize it so it is important to assume good faith some editors may think they are protecting the article from vandalism and may respond to any changes with hostility others may try to promote their own point of view failing to recognize the importance of the neutrality policy examples of ownership behaviour edit if an editor consistently demonstrates behavior similar to that shown in the following examples in a certain article talk page then they probably have issues with page ownership shortcuts wp ownbehavior wp ownbehaviour further information wikipedia no personal attacks actions edit an editor disputes minor edits concerning layout image use and wording in a particular article frequently the editor might claim whether openly or implicitly the right to review any changes before they can be added to the article this does not include the routine maintenance of article consistency such as preservation of established spelling or citation styles an editor reverts justified article changes by different editors repeatedly over an extended period to protect a certain version stable or not an editor reverts a change simply because the editor finds it unnecessary without claiming that the change is detrimental this has the effect of assigning priority between two equivalent versions to an owner s version an editor reverts a good faith change without providing an edit summary that refers to relevant wikipedia policies and guidelines previous reviews and discussions reliable sources or specific grammar or prose problems introduced by the edit repeating such no reason reversions after being asked for a rationale is a strong indicator of ownership behavior an editor comments on other editors talk pages with the purpose of discouraging them from making additional contributions the discussion can take many forms it may be purely negative consisting of threats and insults often avoiding the topic of the article altogether at the other extreme the owner may patronize other editors claiming that their ideas are interesting while also claiming that they lack the deep understanding of the subject necessary to edit the article see the first two comments in the statements section just below an editor reverts any edit with a personal attack in the edit summary statements edit although the following statements seen in isolation from any context or other statements do not indicate ownership behavior or motivation they may be part of a pattern that indicates ownership behavior when they occur along with some form of dogged insistence and relentless pushing without good policy back up and often including edit warring they may be an expression of ownership behavior are you qualified to edit this article you only have x edits pulling rank i created wrote the majority of this article implying some kind of right or status exists because of that i m an expert on the subject if you have any suggestions please put them in the talk page and i will review them please do not make any more changes without my their our approval please clear this with wikiproject z first i can see nothing wrong with the article and there is no need to change anything at all misapplying wp aintbroke undo peanut gallery editor you hadn t edited the article or talk page previously you re vandalizing my hard work see also edit wikipedia consensus levels of consensus external links edit authorshipmodel a discussion of authorship of wiki pages on the communitywiki v t e wikipedia key policies and guidelines five pillars ignore all rules content p verifiability no original research neutral point of view what wikipedia is not biographies of living persons copyright copyright violations image use article titles g notability autobiography citing sources reliable sources medicine do not include copies of lengthy primary sources plagiarism don t create hoaxes fringe theories patent nonsense external links conduct p civility consensus harassment vandalism ignore all rules no personal attacks ownership of content edit warring dispute resolution sockpuppetry no legal threats child protection paid contribution disclosure g assume good faith conflict of interest disruptive editing do not disrupt wikipedia to illustrate a point etiquette gaming the system please do not bite the newcomers courtesy vanishing responding to threats of harm talk page guidelines signatures deletion p deletion policy proposed deletion biographies criteria for speedy deletion attack page oversight revision deletion enforcement p administrators banning blocking page protection editing p editing policy g article size summary style be bold disambiguation hatnotes broad concept article understandability style manual of style contents accessibility dates and numbers images layout lead section linking lists classification categories lists and navigation templates categorization template namespace project content g project namespace wikiprojects user pages user boxes shortcuts subpages wmf p terms of use list of policies friendly space policy licensing and copyright privacy policy list of all policies and guidelines p list of policies g list of guidelines summaries of values and principles retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title wikipedia ownership_of_content oldid 1109674931 categories wikipedia policies wikipedia conduct policies wikipedia culture hidden categories project pages with short description wikipedia move protected project pages navigation menu personal tools not ...