Meta tags:

Headings (most frequently used words):

template, help, removal, the, when, to, remove, navigation, tools, maintenance, contents, overview, addressing, flagged, problem, not, changing, specific, guidance, still, need, see, also, menu, an, example, researching, tagged, issue, personal, namespaces, views, contribute, print, export, languages,

Text of the page (most frequently used words):
the (385), and (151), #template (107), that (100), sources (88), article (83), this (69), not (69), you (64), wikipedia (60), for (56), issue (50), when (47), are (44), #maintenance (43), citations (41), help (40), templates (40), ref (40), citation (39), topic (37), may (34), page (34), references (34), reliable (33), inline (31), with (30), articles (30), remove (28), such (28), should (27), 2022 (25), but (25), december (24), have (24), more (22), all (22), how (21), name (20), content (20), some (20), links (19), section (19), used (19), code (19), notability (19), use (18), pages (18), tag (18), date (18), which (18), placed (18), has (18), secondary (18), text (17), edit (17), what (17), removal (17), multiple (17), using (16), source (16), can (16), please (16), material (16), information (15), example (15), flagged (15), address (15), been (15), cite (15), primary (15), about (14), learn (14), see (14), specific (14), reading (14), lead (14), adding (14), current (13), talk (13), typically (13), message (13), will (13), one (13), must (13), other (12), news (12), issues (12), any (12), like (12), flags (11), having (11), removed (11), sourcing (11), guidelines (11), just (11), removing (11), link (10), through (10), unreferenced (10), displaying (10), editing (10), note (10), there (10), neutral (10), common (10), view (9), discussion (9), redirects (9), reference (9), also (9), need (9), without (9), contains (9), independent (9), support (9), problems (9), problem (9), related (8), from (8), documentation (8), user (8), general (8), bare (8), urls (8), then (8), guidance (8), event (8), longer (8), they (8), improve (8), does (8), policies (8), pov (8), others (8), detail (8), find (8), guide (8), display (8), verifiability (7), type (7), first (7), following (7), these (7), subject (7), want (7), after (7), consensus (7), lack (7), point (7), two (7), books (7), directly (7), appear (7), below (7), challenged (7), addressed (7), non (6), read (6), topics (6), style (6), rather (6), than (6), its (6), most (6), appropriate (6), generally (6), establish (6), notable (6), added (6), only (6), appears (6), written (6), understand (6), jstor (6), scholar (6), original (6), form (6), tags (6), separate (6), reflist (6), footnote (6), each (6), method (6), because (6), footnotes (6), your (6), additional (5), was (5), changes (5), main (5), linking (5), deletion (5), cleanup (5), formatting (5), url (5), still (5), found (5), would (5), followed (5), seen (5), contain (5), many (5), format (5), web (5), change (5), them (5), instead (5), time (5), often (5), add (5), body (5), summary (5), good (5), including (5), given (5), resolved (5), significant (5), exist (5), substantive (5), treat (5), mere (5), whether (5), addressing (5), citing (5), newspapers (5), thus (5), our (5), being (5), synthesis (5), order (5), referencing (5), refimprove (5), care (5), policy (4), available (4), contents (4), navigation (4), short (4), search (4), top (4), external (4), produces (4), messages (4), fix (4), access (4), depending (4), make (4), verifiable (4), meant (4), listed (4), editors (4), edits (4), reader (4), containing (4), important (4), interest (4), neutrality (4), different (4), fairly (4), relevant (4), promotional (4), treatment (4), manner (4), denominator (4), their (4), provide (4), encyclopedia (4), mentions (4), stated (4), where (4), involved (4), place (4), analysis (4), text3 (4), text2 (4), mode (4), opening (4), closing (4), slash (4), single (4), simply (4), word (4), visual (4), sections (4), core (4), imply (4), research (4), once (4), unsourced (4), take (4), fixed (4), click (4), above (4), belong (4), reasonably (4), under (3), apply (3), site (3), english (3), file (3), here (3), tools (3), namespaces (3), personal (3), org (3), php (3), category (3), namespace (3), examples (3), icons (3), speedy (3), introduction (3), language (3), standard (3), needs (3), itself (3), located (3), displayed (3), tagged (3), descriptive (3), consider (3), linkrot (3), attention (3), changing (3), state (3), numerous (3), who (3), published (3), however (3), become (3), free (3), well (3), overview (3), why (3), needed (3), missing (3), dormant (3), quality (3), until (3), sourced (3), means (3), forth (3), case (3), tell (3), advertisement (3), advert (3), insufficient (3), treating (3), remember (3), mention (3), those (3), verify (3), newspaper (3), etc (3), likely (3), guideline (3), ones (3), close (3), statements (3), verified (3), either (3), again (3), preferred (3), don (3), seeing (3), whose (3), contentious (3), living (3), persons (3), demonstrated (3), nature (3), cited (3), presented (3), reach (3), conclusion (3), unless (3), switch (3), might (3), leave (3), discrete (3), brought (3), cases (3), editor (3), usually (3), conflict (3), shortcuts (3), fixing (3), tagging (3), explanatory (3), volunteers (3), contact (2), disclaimers (2), privacy (2), terms (2), organization (2), wikimedia (2), simple (2), version (2), permanent (2), upload (2), recent (2), random (2), events (2), views (2), hidden (2), categories (2), https (2), index (2), title (2), maintenance_template_removal (2), wikiproject (2), requested (2), userspace (2), userboxes (2), noticeboard (2), notices (2), proposed (2), infoboxes (2), notice (2), desk (2), hatnotes (2), review (2), age (2), archive (2), stub (2), lists (2), disputes (2), individual (2), done (2), try (2), users (2), questions (2), could (2), seek (2), interface (2), visit (2), accompanying (2), into (2), placement (2), noted (2), provides (2), researching (2), restore (2), contextual (2), vulnerable (2), rot (2), structure (2), underlying (2), full (2), accessible (2), addition (2), ensure (2), remains (2), assist (2), described (2), merely (2), variation (2), great (2), immediately (2), breaking (2), reports (2), serious (2), discuss (2), updates (2), valid (2), reflect (2), unreliable (2), documents (2), paragraphs (2), already (2), present (2), introducing (2), identify (2), context (2), absence (2), explanation (2), talkpage (2), npov (2), balance (2), represent (2), identifying (2), tone (2), editorial (2), leaving (2), existence (2), build (2), creator (2), higher (2), levels (2), encyclopedic (2), g11 (2), give (2), press (2), amount (2), overcome (2), substantively (2), much (2), passing (2), moreover (2), actually (2), among (2), useful (2), facts (2), looking (2), third (2), parties (2), requires (2), number (2), demonstrate (2), coverage (2), cannot (2), deleted (2), knowledge (2), attempting (2), taken (2), pay (2), com (2), request (2), replacing (2), predominantly (2), relies (2), carefully (2), person (2), further (2), tertiary (2), journal (2), book (2), between (2), _________________ (2), save (2), software (2), commonly (2), modified (2), columns (2), colwidth (2), 30em (2), per (2), denominated (2), brief (2), anywhere (2), piece (2), bottom (2), element (2), elements (2), particular (2), mined (2), takes (2), clicked (2), set (2), copy (2), instruction (2), suggest (2), starting (2), noting (2), guides (2), tutorials (2), placing (2), beginners (2), ideally (2), quotations (2), negative (2), positive (2), include (2), supports (2), minimum (2), lacks (2), remain (2), judgement (2), currently (2), nor (2), applies (2), made (2), thoroughly (2), depth (2), host (2), appearing (2), even (2), poor (2), june (2), 2009 (2), march (2), 2011 (2), orphan (2), entirely (2), three (2), flag (2), another (2), gone (2), applicable (2), delete (2), blue (2), wikitext (2), considered (2), paid (2), matter (2), never (2), associated (2), location (2), did (2), someone (2), else (2), whatever (2), effort (2), tempremove (2), efforts (2), automatically (2), clicking (2), mtr (2), jump (2), cookie, statement, statistics, developers, mobile, agree, registered, trademark, profit, foundation, inc, creative, commons, attribution, sharealike, license, last, edited, utc, اردو, türkçe, ไทย, తెలుగు, српски, srpski, کوردی, سنڌي, සිංහල, português, bahasa, indonesia, ગુજરાતી, français, فارسی, dansk, বাংলা, العربية, afrikaans, languages, printable, download, pdf, print, export, wikidata, item, special, community, portal, contribute, donate, history, log, create, account, contributions, logged, menu, semi, protected, project, description, administration, retrieved, oldid, 1126729324, emoji, comment, images, wikilove, wikibreak, rights, unicode, transwiki, icon, sup, sub, string, handling, semantics, quotation, protection, mergers, warnings, math, ipa, editnotice, header, button, birth, death, navboxes, sister, projects, splitting, codes, functional, redirect, moving, merging, banners, compact, toc, translation, types, boxes, quick, country, banner, confused, asking, designed, new, ask, alternatively, live, assistance, irc, channel, teahouse, searching, exists, way, thereby, field, lines, parameter, previously, additionally, convert, bare_url, necessary, archiving, service, repairing, dead, particularly, record, depends, hosting, maintaining, guaranteed, unusable, hand, preserves, author, less, visually, pleasing, long, converting, maintains, consistent, bot, refill, reflinks, several, uses, uninformative, receiving, massive, indicating, accurate, mark, were, hundreds, thousands, informational, consequence, continues, disclaimer, warns, readers, accordingly, experiencing, flux, fast, attracts, update, real, inaccuracies, draw, improved, soon, story, rapidly, progresses, initial, feel, latest, write, size, depend, breadth, four, composed, fails, follow, stand, own, concise, cultivates, teasing, hinting, follows, explain, summarize, points, prominent, controversies, layout, introduces, concisely, summarizes, nointro, absent, intro, clear, satisfactory, resident, whenever, true, identified, tagger, wishes, attract, viewpoints, unbalanced, perspectives, high, accompanied, actionable, within, conditions, met, disputed, dispute, rewrite, wording, covers, proportionately, far, possible, bias, start, left, surface, salvage, little, alternative, strip, out, reliably, ideal, course, explore, ground, cover, advertisements, limited, commercial, indeed, religious, spiritual, leaders, sports, teams, gaming, clans, though, always, financially, compensated, writings, rewritten, spam, criteria, fundamentally, exclusively, paid1, involvement, noble, causes, reads, buy, company, product, price, online, sellers, unencyclopedic, meaningless, filled, website, release, touting, virtues, neutrally, peacock, buzzwords, inappropriate, advertising, puff, think, focused, better, twenty, badge, mix, seeking, assess, demonstration, overkill, while, certain, caution, nothing, connected, mainstream, vanity, magazines, scholarly, journals, television, radio, documentaries, oversight, reputation, fact, checking, accuracy, websites, blogs, forum, posts, facebook, linkedin, twitter, open, wikis, self, mistakes, beyond, trivial, shown, redirected, merged, meet, significance, presumes, received, work, properly, employs, concept, avoid, subjects, worthy, world, unconnected, indiscriminate, inclusion, finding, large, google, local, archives, library, subscription, services, newspaperarchive, ancestry, prescription, involves, alongside, existing, especially, invalid, purpose, interpretive, claims, too, heavily, materials, accounts, people, opposed, extent, easy, misuse, straightforward, educated, specialized, presents, interpretation, evaluation, predominant, excessively, indirectly, precision, associate, portions, associates, becomes, very, difficult, check, items, includes, precise, unclear, list, rendered, involve, call, rely, blp, verification, response, replace, importance, aspects, embedded, raw, unverified, unref, wrapped, orphaning, line, intact, january, 2008, shows, parameters, show, right, instructions, detailed, themselves, helpful, initially, parts, clarity, served, variant, versions, conversely, highly, unambiguous, orphaned, suitable, renders, inapplicable, overarching, reasoning, behind, thank, publish, insert, turn, backspace, key, keyboard, visualeditor, month, year, somewhere, decision, now, exceptions, plainly, unambiguously, required, proper, ongoing, activity, yet, raised, maintenancedisagreement, wntrmt, lastly, times, fundamental, lacking, discovers, flagging, critical, according, best, interpreted, worth, purely, chiefly, old, sufficient, argument, exception, discussions, encouraged, bullet, silent, fully, supported, strongly, recommend, initiate, failed, coi, concluded, elsewhere, implementing, practice, initiated, requesting, error, discussing, placer, active, upon, determining, perhaps, adequately, permanently, circumstances, wtrmt, shortcut, likewise, providing, basics, indicated, words, phrases, explored, resources, doing, results, called, sure, before, require, part, both, solve, lifeblood, compliance, manual, writing, know, every, works, making, bold, okay, remedied, truly, mechanics, saving, manually, removes, explains, process, examining, arrived, saying, legitimate, offer, exchange, money, scam, warning, ability, highlights, boldly, nutshell, details, processes, procedures, aspect, norms, practices, varying, vetting, bombing, responsible, wayback, machine, http, 20221222174218, wiki, timestamps, capture, fail, success, 2023, 2021, jan, dec, nov,

Text of the page (random words):
of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature which are independent of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail not just mere mentions and in order to establish that the content is not original research the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources refimprove typically placed by the code refimprove date december 2022 having redirects such as improve references verify more sources and citations needed and displaying when reading as this article needs additional citations for verification please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources unsourced material may be challenged and removed find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that has some but insufficient inline citations to support the material currently in the article it should not be used for articles with no sources at all unreferenced should be used instead nor for articles without inline citations but which contain some sources no footnotes should be used instead nor for article on living persons blp sources should be used instead this template no longer applies once an article has been made fairly well sourced to address the issue add additional inline citations to reliable sources for all significant statements in the article whether or not an article has been rendered fairly well sourced may involve a judgement call but in any event the sources used must be reliable ones and articles should not rely predominantly on primary sources but rather on secondary sources note the minimum all quotations material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged and contentious material whether negative positive or neutral about living persons must include an inline citation that directly supports the material no footnotes all of wikipedia s core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing for example the content of wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable sources the notability of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature which are independent of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail not just mere mentions and in order to establish that the content is not original research the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources no footnotes typically placed by the code no footnotes date december 2022 and having redirects such as citations no citations inline citations and no inline citations and displaying when reading as this article includes a list of references related reading or external links but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that contains some form of sourcing but lacks the precision of inline citations to associate given portions of material with specific reliable source s that support that material inline citations make verifiability accessible in short in the absence of an inline citation that associates specific material to a specific source it becomes very difficult for a reader to check what sources given in only some general manner verify what items of content to address the issue add inline citations to reliable sources ideally for all significant statements in the article note that at a minimum all quotations material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged and contentious material whether negative positive or neutral about living persons must include an inline citation that directly supports the material there are many instruction pages that directly and indirectly give guidance on adding inline citations we suggest starting with help referencing for beginners and help introduction to referencing 1 and then seeing wikipedia citing sources for a more involved treatment noting that each contains see also sections linking to additional help pages guides and tutorials a visual guide to placing inline citations through ref ref tags may also help and appears below visual inline citation guide formatting references using inline citations all information in wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources our preferred method of citation is using the cite php form of inline citations using the ref ref elements using this method each time a particular source is mined for information don t copy word for word a footnote is placed in the text inline that takes one to the detail of the source when clicked set forth in a references section after the text of the article in brief anywhere you want a footnote to appear in a piece of text you place an opening ref tag followed by the text of the citation which you want to appear at the bottom of the article and close with a ref tag note the closing slash for multiple use of a single reference the opening ref tag is given a name like so ref name name followed by the citation text and a closing ref tag each time you want to use that footnote again you simply use the first element with a slash like so ref name name in order for these references to appear you must tell the software where to display them using either the code references or most commonly the template reflist which can be modified to display the references in columns using reflist colwidth 30em per our style guidelines the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated references located after the body of the article inline citation code what you type in edit mode what it produces when you save two separate citations ref citation text ref ref citation text2 ref multiple ref name multiple citation text3 ref citation ref name multiple use ref name multiple references reflist two separate citations 1 2 multiple 3 citation 3 use 3 references _________________ citation text citation text2 a b c citation text3 templates that can be used between ref ref tags to format references citation cite web cite book cite news cite journal others examples primary sources primary sources typically placed by the code primary sources date december 2022 having among other redirects primary and displaying when reading as this article relies excessively on references to primary sources please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that too heavily relies on primary sources original materials that are close to an event often accounts written by people who are directly involved as opposed to secondary and to some extent tertiary sources primary sources have their place but they must be used carefully and are easy to misuse typically they should only be used for straightforward descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further specialized knowledge they should not be used to support content that presents interpretation analysis evaluation or synthesis and should not be the predominant form of sourcing in an article moreover primary sources are generally not useful to demonstrate a topic s notability to address the issue add citations predominantly to secondary sources often this involves replacing some of the primary sources with secondary sources and not just adding them alongside existing ones especially where the primary source is being used for an invalid purpose such as interpretive claims and synthesis finding secondary sources is a large topic but make use of google books news and scholar find local newspaper archives go to a library if you have access use pay subscription services like jstor newspaperarchive com ancestry com etc see our guide on free english newspaper sources and others listed here request access to pay prescription sources at wp rx if insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a topic in substantive detail then wikipedia should not have an article on the topic remember that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability notability wikipedia is an encyclopedia a specific type of reference work properly containing articles on topics of knowledge wikipedia employs the concept of notability to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics by attempting to ensure that the subjects of articles are worthy of notice by only including articles on topics that the world has taken note of by substantively treating them in reliable sources unconnected with the topic the general notability standard thus presumes that topics are notable if they have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject notability typically placed by the code notability date december 2022 having redirects such as notable non notable nn and significance and displaying when reading as the topic of this article may not meet wikipedia s general notability guideline please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention if notability cannot be shown the article is likely to be merged redirected or deleted find sources maintenance template removal news newspapers books scholar jstor december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message or some variation linking to one of the subject specific notability guidelines questions whether a topic is notable as stated in the template addressing the issue requires adding citations to reliable secondary sources there are a number of common mistakes seen in addressing this issue adding citations but to unreliable sources we are looking for treatment in sources like mainstream newspaper articles non vanity books magazines scholarly journals television and radio documentaries etc sources with editorial oversight and a reputation for fact checking and accuracy this means generally not random personal websites blogs forum posts facebook linkedin twitter self published sources like open wikis including other wikipedia articles etc in short read and understand wikipedia identifying reliable sources adding citations to connected non independent sources while primary sources may be useful to verify certain facts they must be used with caution and do nothing to establish notability in short we are looking for secondary sources written by third parties to a topic adding citations to sources that merely mention the topic you can cite numerous reliable secondary independent sources and it will not help establish notability if they do not treat the topic substantively think generally two paragraphs of text focused on the topic at issue remember it is much better to cite two good sources that treat a topic in detail than twenty that just mention it in passing moreover citation overkill to sources containing mere passing mentions of the topic is a badge of a non notable topic and if good sources are actually present in the mix they will be hidden among these others from those seeking to assess a topic s demonstration of notability if insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a topic in substantive detail then wikipedia should not have an article on the topic remember that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability advert advert typically placed by the code advert date december 2022 and having redirects such as advertisement advertising ad and puff and displaying when reading as this article contains content that is written like an advertisement please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that reads like an advertisement for example such articles may tell users to buy a company s product provide price lists give links to online sellers use unencyclopedic or meaningless buzzwords be filled with peacock language and read like the website of the article s topic or a press release touting its virtues rather than that of a neutrally written encyclopedia article about the topic advertisements are by no means limited to commercial topics and indeed are often seen for all manner of others such as noble causes religious spiritual leaders sports teams gaming clans and so forth though not always the case a common denominator in promotional articles is the creator having some personal involvement with the topic please note the existence of uw paid1 and higher levels if the creator appears to be financially compensated for their writings here note that pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic may be tagged for speedy deletion under section g11 of the criteria using db g11 or db spam to address the issue rewrite the article from a neutral point of view which is not just about the wording and tone but also as to what the article covers and what it does not cover wikipedia articles should represent fairly proportionately and as far as possible without editorial bias all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic removing all promotional language is a good start but depending on what is left may only be a surface treatment see what you can salvage but often there is little alternative but to strip out all content that is not reliably sourced leaving it in a stub state the ideal of course is to explore the existence of sourcing for the topic and build from the ground up pov pov typically placed by the code pov date december 2022 and having redirects such as npov pov dispute neutrality neutral and not neutral and displaying when reading as the neutrality of this article is disputed relevant discussion may be found on the talk page please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met december 2022 learn how and when to remove this template message flags the issue of an article that has been identified as having a serious issue of balance the lack of a neutral point of view and the tagger wishes to attract editors with different viewpoints to the article an unbalanced or non neutral article is one that does not fairly represent the balance of perspectives of high quality reliable secondary sources this tag is meant to be accompanied by an explanation on the article s talk page about why it was added identifying specific issues that a...